Re: [videoblogging] Re: T Y V M

[Paul Knight]

Arrrghhh! Shiver Mi Timbers!  File sharing p2p or darknet or news groups is bad.  Bad for the record companies and artist and consumers, I thought we were discussing the using snipets of copyrighted music in videoblogs, not who uses p2p like limewire or etc I listened to all the future of darknet interviews, and found nothing but people wanting to make money or get rich off either using music in order to make money, or people sharing in a p2p or darknet.  But hey at the end of the day, who is making money out of videoblogging, using blip.tv, the archive and dailymotion.  I am not paying for any thing on line and subsequently I don't get nothing in the way of money for my works. I still think, the use of copyrighted material in videoblogs that make no money and flies beneath the radar of the MPAA or RIAA.  Then hey why not.  All they want to police is the use of copyrighted protected data thru copying and pirating. If it was the policy of these free video site to implement the law on copyrighted music in videos (Videoblogs) maybe it should be policed in the same way as pronography.  But I doubt that would happen either. By the way I don't share anything on a p2p or newgroups or darknet network.  I merely make funny little films with bits of music I have in my own CD library. Paul Knight On 18 Mar 2006, at 17:06, Enric wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sage words there, > > However, Remember the Self Emptying Bin Video that I sent to the BBC  > for their website, it had 3 snippets of copyrighted music including  > 'The Great Escape', 'Psycho' and 'Jaws',  The BBC had the choice of  > whether to publish the silent one which I sent and the one with the  > music.  If the BBC can't see a problem then why should we? > Not to mention that Wake Me Up When September Ends Video from last  > year with TV news footage and the whole of the track by Green Day,  > that one got a bit of coverage in the papers as I recall. > > Maybe British Law is a bit different perhaps?  I doubt whether, the  > RIAA or MPAA is watching any of our videos, because as a community we  > are still pretty small. > > <snip> From http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/27/1552240&from=rss : ================================ An anonymous reader writes "Two British men have been found guilty of illegally sharing music via a P2P network. The BBC reports that their defense of 'Not knowing it was illegal' and that 'There was no evidence' did not hold water, and they have been ordered to pay the BPI 'between £1500 and £5000' - probably with double that again in costs. Theis isn't the first time the BPI has launched a case of this kind - but it is the first time the accused has tried to fight instead of stumping up the cash straight away. Three other verdicts are pending. ================================== Are you prepared to reimburse that could be prosecutd by BPI ( http://www.bpi.co.uk/ )?    -- Enric SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.