No the other way around. The Virtualization is supeior. But not less dangerous like I thought this morning. Both native boot and Virtualization are protected from viral attacks by virtue of their temporary condition. Any attack is easily thwarted by killing the attacked volume and replacing it with a new boot volume either way. And no Windows viral attack can get at OS X at all.
Virtualization is superior because it runs as a window inside OS X so that no booting back and forth is necessary to use one OS or the other - they co-reside in OS X. -- Taylor Barcroft New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87 barcroft (gizmo) kungax (Skype) kungag5 (iChat-AIM) On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:55 AM, David Meade wrote: > I saw your first post, Kunga, but I didn't catch why running > windows in a virtual machine is "INFERIOR and much more dangerous" > than booting it natively .. care to explain? > > On 4/6/06, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Obolete info. The > real news is that you can run Windows INSIDE OS X. > You just have overlooked my post earlier. > > Parallels Opened Up Their Mac OS X Download this morning and they are > hosed. But when things calm down here's the links: > > <http://www.parallels.com/en/download/mac/> Downloads Page with 3 > PDFs at the bottom to download and read all about it. > > < http://www.parallels.com/en/news/id,8655> Press Release > > I think this is a better solution than Boot Camp. But they each may > have their time and place. > -- > Taylor Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
