How about only including feeds that have CC info that allow them to aggregate? Guess what, no CC means it needs to be presumed that it's Copyright which means they need permission. I don't understand this mentality? Can someone clear out my big-dumb-canadianness so I can get it?
Halcyon Lujah wrote: > Just talked with Dmitry @ Veoh (he posted his phone here a while back). > > He is on the road and apologizes for all the ill-will. > > He will chime in when he is back online, but asked me to pass on to > those concerend about their feeds on Veoh: > > 1) short term, email the name of your feed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to be removed. > 2) they are implementing the automated attribution link as we speak. > (no need to claim your feed) > 3) they are working on ways to exclude feeds based on CC info. > > But they are totally to feedback and suggestions and changes. > > -Halcyon > www.spreadingthepink.com <http://www.spreadingthepink.com> > www.veoh.com/vlogs/cockyvision <http://www.veoh.com/vlogs/cockyvision> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group "videoblogging > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging>" on the web. > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
