On 4/7/06, John Dowdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephanie Bryant wrote: > > Actually, they're outright infringing on my husband's videoblog. > > I empathize, and I appreciate that you wrote them directly, but how is > all this different from the way netculture has treated musicians via > MP3, or how the net has treated Hollywood via BitTorrent?
jd, for one, they are a commercial entity. Let's say I rip my Prince CD's (yes, I have some), transcode them into crappy quality, then put them online at peterprice.com and put ads around them? That's qualitatively and legally different from me downloading a song and listening to it on my iPod. You can see the difference there, no? Peter -- http://mefeedia.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
