On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there some reason creative commons isn't sufficient? The cc verbage says
"you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work" so long as ....
distribute/display/perform seems to cover posting a link to the item.
My thinking is that my cc license has already granted everyone the right to link to my videos (provided the provide attribution).
Although asking is always nice.... I think it's important, especially on the web, to have automated ways of doing all this. (Like the way Creative Commons automates things.) Or else, it's just not scalable.... for example, how would you possibly be able to respond to 1000's of people asking for permission per day. (Especially is there is NO profit involved.)
Is there some reason creative commons isn't sufficient? The cc verbage says
"you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work" so long as ....
distribute/display/perform seems to cover posting a link to the item.
My thinking is that my cc license has already granted everyone the right to link to my videos (provided the provide attribution).
--
http://www.DavidMeade.com
feed: http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Use |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
