That explains it. Part of the problem is that much of my target
audience is in the developing world, and starting with a clip much
larger than 10 megs if prohibitive for them to access in the first
place. I may just have to describe the differences next time rather
than demonstrate them.

andy

--- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:35:08 +0200, Andy Carvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, I created a bunch of clips with various bit rates, but when
> > I then reviewed their file size, for some reason I saw little
> > difference in them. For example:
>
> That is because your clip is very short. If the clip is only one
second 
> the difference in file size will be equal to the bitrate (ie. with
50kbps 
> and 25kbps the difference in file size will be 25kb or about 3
kilobyte). 
> If the clip is one minute the difference will be larger (375 kilobyte 
> versus 188 kilobyte, a difference of 187 kilobyte).
>
> And my examples are fictional of course. There is noticable overhead
with 
> really small files.
>
> --
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>






YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to