I think this is the first time a casting email has been sent to this group which is often more DIY oriented and tends to shun things like traditional scripts and actors.
I don't think the casting email was sexist in any way... just sort of misplaced since it would probably acheive better results from a craigslist posting for an actress rather than to this list. Hey, if a video producer is seeking an attractive woman to host a show about golf, go right ahead. That's the person they're seeking for the role. It has nothing to do with any of the conversation happening here. Carry on...
-Josh
On 5/10/06, Charles HOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was at dinner last night, with 2 women and 4 guys, and the 2 women totally dominated the discussion.
Why can't we look at people as individuals that are either assertive or retiring, and quit looking at their chests for some sort of pattern or correlation? I won't shut someone up because of their sex; so why should I try to give them extra floor time? This is just perpetuating group-based thinking.
I don't want more female vloggers. I don't want fewer of them either. I wouldn't mind more vloggers, but why should I value them more or less based on their genitalia?!
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant Individual Use Explains
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Use |
| Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
