<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I don't like the TV reference either. It is probably better to
> call it topic-based vs. personal-based. Not to say personal vlogs
> don't have topics, but they are usually focused on the person rather
> than the topic.
>
> There really isn't even an argument to debate. It is all content...
> watch what you like and tune out what you don't.
>
> To each his/her own. Viewer choice is the beauty of this movement.
>
> -Matt
>
Watch what you want, when you want, where you want -- content,
timeshift, mobile.
-- Enric
-======-
http://www.cirne.com
http://www.cinegage.com
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Adam Quirk" <bullemhead@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It is my opinion that video blogging will indeed become much
more like
> > > TV than personal diaries.
> > >
> >
> > I think I know what you mean here Matt ("like tv" meaning a show
> format and
> > not off-the-cuff ramblings), and I also do not want to open up the
> show vs.
> > diary argument, but I always feel the need to point out that this,
like
> > every other issue, isn't as cut and dry as people seem to make it
out to
> > be. It's not "TV" or "Personal Diary". There are people making
> "shows" out
> > there in videoblogland that are like nothing you can see on TV.
> Human-Dog
> > and Carp Caviar come to mind.
> >
> > And this one I just found today via Prof. Weagel:
> > http://kinetocast.blogspot.com/
> >
> > --
> > Adam Quirk
> > thepan.org
> >
>
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Use |
| Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
