I haven't really thought this through yet, in fact the idea hadn't 
occurred to me prior to reading this article, but what if instead of 
this sort of preferential pipe for corporate entities, a system along 
the lines of the 800 number were to be put in place. The article 
brings to light the idea that internet may be charged in the states 
based on usage eventually, and implies that destroying net neutrality 
is a means to avoid this. Well, what if companies could opt to pay 
for people's access to material, making this material not part of the 
account usage for the user?

Josh


On May 14, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Devlon wrote:

> Anti 'save the internet' propaganda ;)
>
> On 5/14/06, LeanBackVids.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Small clips are fine, but TV-quality and especially high-definition
> programming could make the internet choke."
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/wireservice/0,70895-0.html?tw=rss.index
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Fireant Individual Typepad
> Use Explains
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Devlon
> http://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.com
> http://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Fireant Individual Typepad
> Use Explains
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>


____________________________________________
"Don't hate the media, become the media."- Jello Biafra



SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant Individual Typepad
Use Explains


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to