How can I have the right to sell fruit but not have the right to charge
more for the watermelons than the oranges?
David Meade wrote:
Sorry I've been traveling and not had time to keep up ...
On 5/20/06, Charles HOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's interesting here is that you and others think that you
have
rights to use equipment that is not yours. ... am not completely deaf
to the idea, but I think that the
hidden assumption should be brought out and exposed.
Not at all the right I'm talking about. I pay for my access to the
Internet. They can charge more if they want ... I'll still pay.
the right I'm talking about is the right to have access to the
information out there without the gatekeepers deciding which should be
more readily available. Without them deciding which should be more
easily published and seen.
Its the 1st amendment and ... like ... the inverse of that. The right
to access others free speech without the powers that be limiting or
hindering my access based on what is most favorable to them.
It has nothing to do with not wanting to pay for my internet access.
It's that very mistake the telcos are tryin to convince people what net
neutrality is about ... and its not .. at all.
--
http://www.DavidMeade.com
feed: http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: You can't save Internet Freedom by taking it away [wa... Charles HOPE
-