I think this is a good precedent that the court is affording bloggers
with similiar protections as they do journalists:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/27/business/media/27blog.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

-Zachary
www.quiverandquill.com

On 11/27/06, Richard (Show) Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks ... I did the resynch thing and it fixed the problem ... Richard
>
>  On 11/26/06, Adam and Vikki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > I have been having similar problems and I have done three things
>  >
>  > one - resycn the feed, in the trobleshootise section
>  > two - ping the feed
>  > three - posting a blank post in my blogger(and I don't know why that
>  > works i just found out by accident, I delete it later)
>  >
>  > repeat!
>  >
>  > Hope you get it sorted cos I have just subscribed (great idea)
>  >
>  > Adam
>  >
>  > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
>
>  > "Richard (Show) Hall"
>  >
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > The most recent mp4 file on
>  > >
>  > > http://inspiredhealing.tv
>  > >
>  > > Does not show up in iTunes and I can't figure out why. The feed is:
>  > >
>  > > http://feeds.feedburner.com/inspiredhealing
>  > >
>  > > Any help appreciated
>  > >
>  > > ... Richard
>  > >
>  > > p.s. Could it have something to do with the suffix .mp4, which we
>  > are using
>  > > for the first time, rather than .mov?
>  > > p.p.s. I spent a lot of time fixing an initial MIME type issue with
>  > the help
>  > > of Michael and Google, by creating .htaccess files. I thought that
>  > might be
>  > > the problem but the MIME type thing seems to be working in that firefox
>  > > seems to be treating/playing it like it does any quicktime file
>  > (which is
>  > > wasn't doing before)
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > http://richardhhall.org
>  > > http://richardshow.com
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  http://richardhhall.org
>  http://richardshow.com
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>  

Reply via email to