--- In [email protected], "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An interesting article from the online viewer perspective > > http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/editorial/16154786.htm > > So that's why no one is watching....I'm not consistant or > compelling....
an old prediction stays true. In the 50s there were 3 channels to watch and nothing on. In the 60s there were 5 channels to watch and nothing on. In the 70s there were 21 channels to watch and nothing on. In the 80s there were 368 channels to watch and nothing on. In the 90s there were 2319 channels to watch and nothing on. In the 00s there are 1,283,381 channels to watch and nothing on. In the 10s there will be 17,281,217 channels to watch and nothing on. you are all new channels, remember to brand them. at least when there's nothing on you'll remember where you're watching it. there's nothing on, yet the number of average hours people spend watching a screen has increased steadily since 1920. what are they watching? something.
