As I've said several times before, I was and remain determinedly agnostic about this whole situation - I don't know or care who's right, and it may not be possible for anyone short of some omniscient deity (and I don't believe in one) to ever know the "truth".
So you have taken sides and dislike Amanda. That's your prerogative. But what does that have to do with your public attack on her work? The Rolling Stones are probably not very nice human beings - didn't Marianne Faithful have a thing or two to say about that, when she finally dried out? Jerry Lee Lewis liked having sex with (and marrying) 14 year olds. Not someone I'd particularly enjoy having over for tea, probably. But they all make great music. So... don't disguise a personal attack as an artistic critique. That's just a cheap shot. On 12/13/06, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > So why did you single out Amanda for this vitriol? > > > > Only because she has lied to the public, specifically us in this group, > about the Rocketboom situation, and has underhandedly stolen our colleague > Andrew's hard work, time, and business contacts and passed them off as her > own. > > I find it's necessary to take sides in situations such as this, because > standing on the sideline applauding the chaos is inhumane. > > Someone is lying to you, either Amanda or Andrew. I don't know Amanda. I > know Andrew. He has not lied to me before and I see no reason why he would > now. > > It's a very shitty thing, what she did. > -- best regards, Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
