Yeah, going through the same decision. 24p or HD. Can't we just have both on the same camera for under $2k? :( Maybe someday.
My brother shot most of his short films using the DVX, and it looks fantastic, but the stuff out of the HC1 and other Sony HD cameras looks wonderful in their own way. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Give it up for content y'al! > > I certainly lust after an HD television. Our friend has a sweet 42" Panasonic > and we're always in awe of the HD experience. > > So... what does that have to do with videoblogging? Not a whole lot today, > not something most vloggers need to worry about. But tomorrow is coming > quick. > > Rocketboom has their stuff in HD. I shoot on a Sony HC1 which is small > and not very expensive. However I hardly ever edit in HD - I basically think > of it as a really good SD camera with sharp detail. But I've got that footage in > HD should I have an opportunity to show a video on TV, or in a theater, or > online. > > Strangely enough, I'm considering ditching the HC1 for a Panasonic DVX. > I just love the 24p look, and the gamme curves (or whatever) that just look > fantastic. > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" <solitude@> > wrote: > > > > 1) Shoot using the cheapest camera you can find. > > 2) Embrace compression artifacts. > > 3) Rejoice, send me a link and spend the money you save on things that > > actually matter (hint: it's not a green screen). > > > > - Andreas > > > > Den 18.12.2006 kl. 01:58 skrev Joshua Paul <joshpaul@>: > > > > > Not completely on topic, but not off either. I just posted an entry > > > on my blog. In a nutshell, I don't care about HD...just good content. > > > > > > http://www.joshpaul.com/?p=250 >
