What is a videoblog?

--- In [email protected], "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> can we just drop this and talk about boobies again?  Please.....no 
> one is going to change their minds on how they feel.....how bout we 
> talk about something that will not spark such strong 
feeling....like 
> religion......
> 
> ;)
> 
> --- In [email protected], "David" <david@> wrote:
> >
> > That video (that series of videos) probably cost more than we can 
> > imagine and probably more than anyone on this board has spent in 
a 
> > year on his own work.  And to make matters worse, it was hoakey.  
> The 
> > awe-shucks sensibility that pervades it is so tiresome and 
> > hackneyed.  Do you think that Bush read his lines for it moments 
> > before or after he committed to actions that would lead to 
> thousands 
> > of more people being killed?  There's something pathologically 
> > disconnected about its aesthetic.  We see, yet again, Bush 
sitting 
> > among the children.  Maybe he's trying to tell us somethnig.  
Maybe 
> > he knows what some of us won't admit: he belongs at the kiddie 
> table.
> > 
> > -David
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Irina <irinaski@> wrote:
> > >
> > > now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
> > > i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's taken
> > > from my paycheck to  pay for the war.
> > > 
> > > On 12/19/06, Bill Streeter <bill@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   Carl,
> > > >
> > > > I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos 
> are 
> > PR,
> > > > and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But 
it's 
> > more
> > > > than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
> > > > criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such 
crap 
> to
> > > > soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq 
that 
> he
> > > > started with no good or legal cause, and under false 
pretenses 
> > that
> > > > is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings. 
The 
> > man
> > > > belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with 
> all 
> > the
> > > > other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the 
> facts 
> > no
> > > > matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the 
> radio
> > > > tells you.
> > > >
> > > > Bill Streeter
> > > > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> > > > www.lofistl.com
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > CarLBanks <carlbanks@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If 
> Kerry
> > > > made a
> > > > > Christmas video everyone would say "Oh, how cute!".
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <solitude@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
> > > > > > <carlbanks@<carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com>
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from 
making
> > > > political
> > > > > > > statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts 
out.
> > > > Political
> > > > > > > statements had no place in this movie since it had 
> nothing 
> > to
> > > > do with
> > > > > > > politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do 
you
> > > > honestly think
> > > > > >
> > > > > > that they were made for shits and giggles?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> > > > > > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > http://geekentertainment.tv
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to