i think practicality wins out here Lucas it appears that the divining job was not too tough for them as the videos I indicated to them are now removed.
markus On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:03 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote: > > You refused to identify the vids, asking them to figure out for you > what those were. If you identified them then you would be within the > abilities granted per DMCA notice-and-takedown, but otherwise you go > beyond. If they put a staffer on the job of divining what URLs are > involved, they are opening the door to a new obligation. > > For example, imagine that Google gets: > (a) a demand to not link to http://example.com/foo.mp3, which is an > unauthorized host of a Foo Fighters recording. > (b) a demand to not link to any infringing Foo Fighters recordings. > > If (b) is the law of the land, the scope of the DMCA will have been > massively expanded. > --- Markus Sandy http://feeds.feedburner.com/havemoneywillvlog http://feeds.feedburner.com/apperceptions http://feeds.feedburner.com/digitaldojo http://feeds.feedburner.com/spinflow [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
