great idea, jay/jd. maybe some kind of meter or cc type of logos for the various groupings would be helpful too.
sull On 1/18/07, Jay Dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Agreed. > Now we have a wiki to expand. > The point is to highlights TOS through the lens of what a creator needs to > know. > > Usually a TOS is written for what a lawyer needs to know. > > And very often TOS totally ignores what is important for creator's. > The TOS wiki is the first step in > Educating ourselves and video hosting sites as to the desires of > videobloggers. > > Jay > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:00:14 > To:<videoblogging@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Terms of Service post > > Its a very hard thing to boil a really large legal document into a couple > bullet points. I think jd's done a great job, its just a matter of > accounting for some shades of gray. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com <videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com> > To: videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com <videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thu Jan 18 15:17:20 2007 > Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Terms of Service post > > I would say this problem is in part due to the fact that 'can they > sell or license your video' is worded unclearly, does a yes mean yes > to both sell and license, or just license? It would be better if that > were clearer. > > I welcome warmly any guides or other things that can spread clarity on > these issues, but unfortunately the devil is in the detail and I guess > its easy to get it slightly wrong. > > Also theres a mistake in the google section, it mentions yahoo! > > Cheers > > Steve of Elbows > --- In videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'd actually like to apologize for my overly hasy reaction. I would > just like to discuss the issue of content sales, ads (which are > opt-in) and "wide reuse" rights. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com <videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com> > > To: videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com <videoblogging@: <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com>; > JD Lasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thu Jan 18 14:06:48 2007 > > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Terms of Service post > > > > On 1/18/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fyi, this inaccurately describes blip's tos. Its wrong on several > points, including extremely major ones. We do not, for instance, have > the right to resell our users' work without express user permission > and would never do such a thing. > > > > Im cc'ing JD on this email so he can respond. > > > > jay > > > > > > -- > > Here I am.... > > http://jaydedman.: <http://jaydedman.com> com > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
