I'm thinking just in terms of fragmented viewing attention across a number of carrier-neutral sites equalling and exceeding the traffic to YT.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sull > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] MyHeavy and Magnify and > aggregators in general > > ok, "can take down YT" did confuse me. still does. but ok. > > On 1/29/07, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Keep in mind that in terms of centralization, blip.tv is > > > behind YouTube. > > > > It's in our best interests to encourage a huge crop of > > > carrier-neutral > > > > aggregators which, with content from hosting sites like > > > blip, can take > > > > down YT. Our interests are aligned here. > > > > > > This is not about "taking down YT" either, mike. > > > At this point, it is probably not even feasible... as > google can let > > > it live forever if they want. > > > > > > Are you suggesting the the "carrier-neutral" aggregators should > > > exclude Youtube? > > > That wouldnt be very neutral. > > > > I'm suggesting no such thing, Sull. They should include > everyone and > > be truly neutral. I think you misunderstand me. I'm agreeing with > > Lucas that aggregators are incredibly important so that content > > creators can get their content in front of lots of eyeballs without > > having to go through a major player, whether that be YT or > blip or someone else. > > > > > > > > -- > Sull > http://vlogdir.com (a project) > http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) > http://interdigitate.com (otherly) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
