movie can imply more and is warmer/deeper, while video in colder and technical.
sull On 12 Feb 2007 09:38:28 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had seen the video Jay Dedman recommended on Web 2.0 before > from e-learning circles or wherever, and it struck me that > people here commented on it seamlessly when, as I recall, > there was no video in it! On the Internet a movie has become > something quite different from a video. A movie can be made > with no video, or video can be embedded in a movie. Video is > the stuff that comes out of digital video cameras or Web cams. > Maybe it seems seamless because online sites like YouTube or Eyespot > are automatically turning videos into movies? What do you think > about the distinction between (a) movie and (a) video? > > Practical questions, if I may: Do any programs do both screencasting > and video editing or movie making? Can you get good results as a > workaround by pointing your camera at your computer while Websurfing? > If so, what kind of lighting and other techniques would work best? > > Collegially, Steve McCarty > Professor, Osaka Jogakuin College, Japan > President, World Association for Online Education (1998-2007) > Online library: http://www.waoe.org/steve/epublist.html > YouTube Educational Group: http://www.youtube.com/group/educational > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
