:-)) I have come back from an evening out, quite drunk, to find all my questions answered, and then some. Paul, Steve, JV, you are my heros. my thee muskehounds. Halcyon, i guess that makes you Dogtanian. i am going to check out Veoh finally tomorrow. why did i waste all that time googling and surfing for answers today, when i should have just asked my questions to the Group and trusted in the Force? I go to bed happy, and not just because of the cheap wine tomorrow i'll wake up with a headache and a vague memory of telling four people that I've never met that they are cartoon dogs. R
On 23 Feb 2007, at 22:03, Halcyon wrote: I love DivX! It has become my preferred format. In fact, my current 3 step DivX/Veoh-related publishing flow for those that care: 1) I export a hi-res DivX version directly from iMovie (QT -> expert settings --> DivX --> high quality) 2) I upload to Veoh where the full-res DivX version is available via their P2P system and player 2 a) Veoh creates an ipod version and flash version 2 b) Veoh uploads the file to youtube and myspace for me. 3) I upload a copy of the DivX file to stage6.com I sit back and giggle while the world digests my brilliance. -Halcyon pinkbroadcasting.com On 2/23/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I feel a bit of a fool. I was talking to somebody about vlogging > and they were raving to me about the quality and compression of DivX. > > I don't know anything about DivX. I don't feel that much wiser after > reading up about it on Wikipedia, DivX.com etc > > I don't know any vloggers who use it, and can't remember seeing a > DivX labelled feed, the way many people list QT, WMV and iPod feeds. > Why do so few people use it, when it would appear to be very popular > among P2P video sharers? > > Every conversation about which formats to use, always discusses QT, > MP4, Windows Media and Flash? When people talk about using Windows > Media files, are they also assuming that DivX is under this banner, > because Windows Media Player comes preinstalled with the DivX codec? > > And if so, why do people provide wmv files and feeds instead of divx, > if DivX is so much better? Or is it not? > > Yours confused > > Rupert > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
