Something I came across recently.... http://www.cellblock.com
sull On 12 Mar 2007 12:01:21 -0700, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The flash meeting chat that Harold highlighted had some interesting > talk about collaboration in it too. > > I guess its a subject that comes up quite often here, and yet I never > ending up recording much progress on that front. I know a stock answer > has become 'use spinxpress' and clearly it must work and be good > because it comes recommended by some people who will ahve used it for > such purposes. As I havent used it myself I remain pretty ignorant > about exactly what it offers beyond peer2peer filesharing, anybody got > a few moments to elaborate on how it fits into the process, and what > sort of collaborative processes fit well with this tool? > > Anyway I guess there are all sorts of non-technical reasons why > collaboration can be a challenge. Having time, being in sync with the > others, communicating ideas that may be hard to put into words, > differing aims of different people, different inspirations etc, can > all get in the way. > > I would guess that maybe some of these hurdles could be overcome with > something similar to the youtube phenomenon - tools that work in the > browser easily, and a critical mass of users and content. Im quite > interested in systems where there would be millions of very short > video fragments available in the system, and peple could construct > vidoes from these and their own pieces. I am interested in 'video' > type content being created semi-automatically from other sources (eg a > text-to-video thing based on keywords that relate to the clip fragments). > > Ive run out of time to waffle now, any thoughts on this or completely > different aspects of the collaboration thang? > > Cheers > > Steve Elbows > > > -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
