--- In [email protected], Lan Bui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That looks really cool. Super wide format looks very cinematic. > > I feel like 320x240 is too small for visuals; and that is what video > blogging is about. If you don't have visuals then why not just blog > or podcast? > > -Lan > www.LanBui.com > --------------------
+1 that the format looks really cool. :D I haven't really given working in an aspect ratio like that any thought, but if I were interested in something like that, I'd shoot it at a width equal to or greater than 960 and edit in FCP in a timeline native to the size I shot it in. I'd then copy all the clips and drop them into a sequence that was already set up with the 960x310 ratio. That way, you'd have the whole frame filled off the bat, and your responsibility would be to apply your motion settings to each clip to show the proper sections of each particular clip. Of course, this assumes you shot the video correctly, understanding that you'd only be using a thin section of the video you're seeing in your viewfinder. -- Bill C. http://TheLab.blip.tv > On Mar 14, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Loiez D. wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am thinking about new formats for videos and i am trying to work in > 960 x310 ( 16/9 - 1/3 ) > > I made 2 short examples here > http://xi-vlog.loiez.org/2007/03/sometimes.php > http://xi-vlog.loiez.org/2007/03/attila_bouvier_bernois.php > > I work on a mac and FCP > > My questions is ; > What is the best way to work in panoramic format ? > With the new computer screen do you think that it could be a good way ? > Is the 320x240 has been ? > > thx > > Loiez > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
