Yes, twitter recently released an API...

David

On 4/5/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Wow, that's a complex chain of events Rupert, but once it's set up it
> sounds very simple to use.
>
> I can't believe you run if through blogger on top of everything else.
> I hope blip fixes whatever problem there was so you can go directly
> from blip to twitter.
>
> I'm suprised that you're able to add the intro and outro right on the
> phone. Supercool. I can't imagine how the editing process works, got
> to get my hands on one of those n95's.
>
> I was hoping... actually thinking that blip had already implimented an
> automated system whereby an intro and outro could automatically be
> added to incoming videos via mail, and that blip already had twitter
> cross posting. Maybe that's something in the near future at blip...
> cross posting to twitter. I haven't checked into it but I wonder if
> twitter has an API... might be great for cross posting photos to from
> flickr so you can mobile photoblog through flickr to twitter as well.
>
> Then there's audioblogging. I don't think blogger does call in
> audioblogging anymore, but I believe eric rices hipcast and a few
> other services do. The idea being that it'd be like calling in and
> leaving a voice mail, but once posted to twitter if can not only be
> listened to by any friend via mobile but also the web.
>
> -Mike
>
> On 4/5/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org>>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Bill and Mike! And everyone else who has commented and got
> > involved. It's SO MUCH FUN.
> >
> > I am suddenly out of time to reply as fully as I want to, sneaking
> > time on the computer in the kitchen while pretending to make
> > dinner... :)
> >
> > The frequency of my text and video twittering has been hit today by
> > work and Kate returning from holiday... but hopefully I'll get back
> > on song tomorrow. She totally doesn't get why on earth I would want
> > to do this, and glazes over when I enthuse to her - so I thought it'd
> > be fun to ask people from the community to explain to her why it's
> > cool, since y'all are the reason. So if you fancy dropping her a
> > line here or via the twittervlog comments section, I think it'd go
> > down well.... or not ;)
> >
> > As far as what you said Mike, I'm totally with you. As always, you
> > put into words what I can't.
> >
> > And being as brief as I can, the workflow is that I film and edit in
> > the phone, then send by email, using my home or café wifi to Blip's
> > mobile upload. They then automatically crosspost to my Blogger
> > blog. The feed from that then goes to feeds.feedburner.com/
> > twittervlog/ Then a free online service called twitterfeed.com
> > automatically checks my feedburner feed updates and sends them to
> > twitter.
> >
> > The phone will make titles, but not very beautifully, so I made a 2
> > second start and end title in iMovie, compressed to MP4 and
> > bluetoothed it over to the phone. Now I just add them in the in-
> > phone editor. Which gets better the more you use it, but is pretty
> > far from FCP!
> >
> > Ideally, I'd like to have done the publishing without the Blogger
> > step, just Blip, but there was a boring technical problem with
> > twitterfeed and twitteriffic (the mac desktop reader) not encoding
> > the Blip feed. Won't go into it - suffice to say that with the
> > amazing Charles Hope at Blip we figured out to use RSS2Twitter.com
> > instead of twitterfeed.com - which is what he now uses for his
> > vlogweek2007 updates (what a service!) But by that time I'd set the
> > whole thing up to run with Blogger, so I thought I might as well keep
> > it that way.
> >
> > OH NO, the dinner. Help! I should be vlogging this :)
> >
> > ...and help me convert kate!
> >
> > Rupert
> >
> > Twittervlogging during Videoblogging Week 2007:
> > http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/
> > http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/
> > http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/
> >
> >
> > On 5 Apr 2007, at 14:57, Mike Meiser wrote:
> >
> > Rupert, I've been seriously enjoying your twitter vlog.
> >
> > You'll have to forgive me for just wagering in on this thread if
> > seemingly by random I didn't feel like starting a new thread.
> >
> > I've long been an outspoken evangelist of mobile vlogging. Theorizing
> > it would enhance the value of vlogging as a means of communications
> > rather than as a means of episodic or entetainment. I do believe
> > everyday communications (that just so happen to be public) is the most
> > important value, the height of vloggings purpose... though many in the
> > outside world are blinded by the flickring bubbling surface of viral
> > videos, cheap laughs and so on. This is not to knock episodic content
> > or viral video... merely to say that vlogging can be SOO much more...
> > that people don't realize.
> >
> > In many ways I've often said videoblogging is ironicly fullfilling on
> > the misplaced hype and promise of the last 30 years of "video
> > telephony" that never materialized. Many are just beginning to
> > realize that syncronous realtime explicit one to many communications
> > is not perhaps ever going to be a mainstream part of video
> > communications... and that maybe, just maybe, asynchronous,
> > one-to-many communications... most easily understood when put in the
> > perspective of photosharing, as on flickr, or simple blogging...
> > perhaps IS the future of the mass use of video in communications.
> >
> > What I see in twitter vlog is nothing less than another step toward
> > the fullfillment of that promise of vlogging. There are dozens of
> > other movlogs, but never have I seen it done so effectively and
> > fluidly. What I like most are that the trappings and cruft of the
> > vlogging interface and aesthetic seem to fall away. Twitter brings
> > this same aspect to blogging by stripping it down to 140 characters...
> > but by bringing videoblogging to the twitter context you've done the
> > same with videoblogging.
> >
> > My question is on process.
> >
> > I see that you're basically going from your Nokia N95, over wifi I
> > presume, to blip.tv to twitter.
> >
> > What I'm wondering about is all the details inbetween? How much if
> > any on camera editing do you do, how hard is it to publish the video?
> > Do you add the video intro on the camera or is it happening as part of
> > the publishing process?
> >
> > Twitter vlog does remind me of Jan of Faux Press's movlogging style...
> > but she seems to be using an older Nokia video phone with only first
> > gen 3gp support and no wifi which seems to pose quite a bit of
> > technical and time constraint which seems to limit the fluidity and
> > easy with which she can communicate with the device.
> >
> > What I'm interested in is workflow. There is both the producing
> > workflow and the consumptive workflow. Right now while the N95 does
> > do aggregation there are as of yet only primitive mobile consumption
> > options. I imagine if I had an N95 I could actually watch your
> > twitter vlog with all my other friends twitterings via wifi... but
> > mobile vlogging will only reach it's full potential when there is a
> > critical mass of both mobile video production and transmition, and
> > mobile consumption. In short... I'm waiting for the day when my
> > mobile phone beeps... and I can flip it open... watch a video from my
> > friend rupert half way around the world in london... and then
> > immediately record a response, click a one click publish button and
> > know within minutes it will be on my twitter or other vlog being
> > enjoyed by my friends wherever they may be.
> >
> > Of course it's about more than video, ultimately it's about
> > communicating fluidly with photo, audio, text, and video... whatever
> > the situation demands... to participate in a fluid near real-time
> > conversation with one's friends. Twitter has started to lead us down
> > the next leg of this path by turning text messaging from and explicit
> > 1:1 and text only medium to a one-to-many model... and allowing
> > through simple urls the inclusion of elements of photo, video and
> > audio.
> >
> > So... I also wonder if anyone has tried doing audio blogigng or
> > photoblogging explicitely with twitter.
> >
> > -Mike
> > mmeiser.com/blog
> > mefeedia.com
> >
> > On 4/3/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org>>
> wrote:
> > > Yeah, I wanted to go look, then come back and write, but I got sucked
> > > into your video mountain never to re-emerge.
> > > Amazing.
> > > And that doggie cam video is great.
> > > Rupert
> > >
> > > Twittervlogging during Videoblogging Week 2007:
> > > http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/
> > > http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > On 3 Apr 2007, at 18:36, schlomo rabinowitz wrote:
> > >
> > > Exactly Bev!
> > >
> > > You have more drive than 90% of us lazy videobloggers! An impressive
> > > collection of videos to be sure.
> > >
> > > Schlomo
> > > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
> > > http://winkshow.com
> > > http://hatfactory.net
> > > http://evilvlog.com
> > >
> > > On 4/2/07, Bev Sykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <basykes%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Videoblogging WEEK? Hey, pikers, I have managed to post a video
> > a day
> > > > since
> > > > August of 2005, with very few missed days. Granted, they aren't
> > > all up to
> > > > the standards some of you set, but still I'm rather proud of that
> > > > accomplishment. Not bad for an old lady.
> > > >
> > > > http://basykes.blip.tv/
> > > >
> > > > I am presently dealing with a broken DV camera, so am back working
> > > with my
> > > > digital, and I'm concentrating right now on interviewing my 87
> > > year old
> > > > mother and recording stories of her childhood, so there is a lot
> > > of that
> > > > kind of stuff.
> > > >
> > > > But if you don't watch all 552 of the videos on Blip, at least
> > > take a look
> > > > at my favorite,
> > > >
> > > > http://www.blip.tv/file/84092/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bev Sykes
> > > > http://funnytheblog.blogspot.com
> > > > http://funnytheworld.com
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  
>



-- 
David King
davidleeking.com - blog
http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to