Loeiz, Maybe I'm being stupid and I should probably take more time to think before I post, but 1920 x 1080 is a 16:9 image, so why do you need to use a 16:9 filter on it and then resize? Surely you can just cut it and export it at half its original size 960x540? Unless your 1920x1080 has further anamorphic squeeze on it. Sorry if I've missed the point. Rupert http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/ http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/
On 16 Apr 2007, at 11:00, Loiez D. wrote: Hi all, I shoot in 16:9 with my Sony HDV and i love this format I just have a little problem I shoot in HDV ( 1920x1080) I edit on FCP I put a filter 16:9 (1/3) I convert with Quicktime I resize my video 960x360 by cropping But i get a little anamorphosis A better way ?? Some examples here : http://xi-vlog.loiez.org/2007/04/reel.php http://xi-vlog.loiez.org/2007/04/_jig_.php Loiez Le 16 avr. 07 à 11:37, Rupert a écrit : > I say go for it, if your camera allows it. Personally, i think 16:9 > is a prettier window through which to view and frame the world. 4:3 > is too square for me. > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
