No it was H.264.  Here are the settings I used in Videora

Videora ipod converter v. 2.11 (make sure you have the iPod converter
as they have several different versions)

Go to settings make sure the device is iPod (should be default)
for simplicity sake select the drop down profile for

H.264 VGA 512kbps Stereo/128kbps (this is the level 3 or 640x480 profile)

Then go over to Edit profile button to the left. This pops up the edit
profile window.  Rename this profile so you can tell it apart from the
original.

Click the video tab at the top

Here you can adjust the bitrates and such for the profile. You should
leave the H.264 Baseline level 3 (level 1.3 is 320x240)

to the right set your resolution to 640 width and 480 height 

bottom left of the window is ABR or 2 pass (Leave it on ABR)
Select your desired bitrate to manipulate file size.

Save it and use this profile.

I've used these settings and transfered the 640x480 file from itunes
to my iPod, but as I said before.  I have audio drift problems, you
may not depending on your input file. (still working on my problem)

Good luck.

Rev. Chumley
http://www.cultofuhf.com


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "wazman_au" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 
> Great!
> 
> If your format is definitely H.264, 640x480 and you have actually seen
> it working on a video iPod then I'm interested in your settings ... if
> you don't mind sharing! Or point me towards the video and I'll try it
> myself.
> 
> Without wanting to sound patronising: It is possible that you've put
> out a 640x480 that is generic MPEG-4, not H.264.
> 
> Waz
> 
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chumley" <metaflibble@> wrote:
> >
> > I had no problems making a 640x480 h.264 ipod compatable with Videora,
> > my problem is that it constanly unsynchs the audio.  Its fine to begin
> > with but drifts by up to 5 or 6 seconds of lag by the end of the show.
> > 
> > I'm going to play with it some more, try out the avisyth profiles.
> > I'll let you guys know if I find a "solution"
> > 
> > Rev. Chumley
> > http://www.cultofuhf.com
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "wazman_au" <elefantman@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, I struggled along with Videora iPod Converter (let's call it
> > > VIP) and its clunky, ambiguous interface hasn't changed much since I
> > > last tried it. Oh well, it's free ...
> > > 
> > > Anyway, as far as I can see it doesn't solve the problem being
> > > discussed here. Try as I might, I could not make it export a
640x480,
> > > H.264 file that would sync to the iPod. Oh, it also trashed the
audio
> > > track and the titles as well, but it's always done that to my files!
> > > 
> > > The creators themselves seem to be under the impression that VIP CAN
> > > create H.264/640x480/baseline low-complexity, but using the
available
> > > settings I could find no way of achieving this.
> > > 
> > > I've trawled the forums, but the problem is software like VIP is
that
> > > the discussion tends to be among people who want to rip DVDs and get
> > > them on their iPod however possible, regardless of file size. And 
> > > whenever someone has a problem the respondents say "it must be a
> > > problem with your source video". The forums tend not to be populated
> > > by people like us who are thinking about file size and what will
work
> > > seamlessly for our viewers.
> > > 
> > > This whole "low-complexity" thing is weird. A lot of websites
offering
> > > video tools use the term blithely when reeling off iPod-compatible
> > > specs, but it seems few or none of them actually understand what it
> > > involves - I think many of them just assume it's synonymous with
> > > "baseline" and a generic term rather than something Apple have
cooked
> > > up and locked down to a certain bitrate range. 
> > > 
> > > I'm tempted by the Handbrake hack posted elsewhere on this thread,
> > > which seems to be about placing certain flags in the file to trick
> > > iTunes into accepting it. But what's to stop Apple changing
things in
> > > the future so that files encoded that way will no longer work?
> > > 
> > > Waz
> > > 
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to