Thanks Mike, I appreciate the advice from the source!

andy


--- In [email protected], "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andy,
> 
> I would definitely suggest having separate blip accounts for each of
> your vlogs.  The way blip is designed, it's best to have one account per
> show.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Mike
> Blip.tv
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andydragt
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
> 
> Can I just ask a clarifying question...
> 
> It's seems like conventional wisdom has recommended against using a
> seperate blip account for each vlog. However, with the new show
> player, it makes sense to have your content in seperate accounts. 
> Otherwise it's pretty much useless.  
> 
> Heres the question: Is this "two weeks" comment about a solution to
> this problem or should I begin to seperate my content into different
> accounts so I have the option of using the player on one of my sites?
> 
> Am I right in understanding the "best practice" has been to have only
> one account and cross-post to different blogs?
> 
> thanks all,
> 
> Andy Dragt
> 
> www.developinggr.com - a vlog about development in GR, MI
> www.developinggr.com/house - a vlog about my home renovation...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Mike Hudack" <mike@> wrote:
> >
> > Two weeks.  :)
> > 
> > Yours,
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
> > player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
> > 
> > 
> > -Matt
> > http://neovids.tv
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Michael Verdi" <michael@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good
> for
> > > things like user profiles on various social networks.
> > > - Verdi
> > > 
> > > On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack <BillCammack@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   --- In [email protected]
> > <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > "Steve Watkins" <steve@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
> > being
> > > > > pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
> > > > > experience to be completely available from within a flash
> player.
> > > > > Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
> > are
> > > > > hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of
> your
> > > > > blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
> > page
> > > > > rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
> > > > > because the expectation may be that you embed their player in
> your
> > > > > site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
> > want. But
> > > > > this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be
> embedded
> > on
> > > > > another site or used as a widget.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
> > player
> > > > > so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
> > which
> > > > > is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip
> shows,
> > > > basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they
> point
> > to
> > > > the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
> > > >
> > > > This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
> > > > takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only
> thing
> > > > that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
> > "guide"
> > > > and then "read more about this on blip.tv", which takes you to the
> > > > individual video's page on blip.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bill C.
> > > > BillCammack.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
> > in the
> > > > > past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
> > it be
> > > > > through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
> > > > > inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
> > > > > tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
> > 320x240. I
> > > > > see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it
> look
> > > > > quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to
> be
> > > > > displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
> > > > > players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
> > > > >
> > > > > Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
> > wordpress
> > > > > that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
> > player.
> > > > > I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology
> for
> > > > > now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Elbows
> > > > > --- In [email protected]
> > <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > "Mike Hudack" <mike@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For some people the blog format is really important.
> > Cross-posting,
> > > > > > copy & paste and everything else we've built to support the
> blog
> > > > format
> > > > > > aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and
> we're
> > > > going
> > > > > > to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
> > > > right for
> > > > > > everyone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > >
> >
> [mailto:[email protected]<videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>]
> > > > On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aaron & Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think
> > options for
> > > > > > people
> > > > > > are important and I do like the ability to look through an
> > archive but
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
> > permalinks,
> > > > > > comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That
> > player is
> > > > > > really
> > > > > > built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it
> > only
> > > > shows
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to
> go
> > > > on the
> > > > > > blip
> > > > > > blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip
> > blog to
> > > > > > leave
> > > > > > a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu.
> > That thing
> > > > > > pulls
> > > > > > in stuff completely out of context that you have no control
> > over. Of
> > > > > > course
> > > > > > you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use
> > the show
> > > > > > player
> > > > > > at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is
> > important and
> > > > > > desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited
> > about
> > > > > > dropping
> > > > > > it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Verdi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield <steve@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this morning.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.stevegarfield.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I blogged about it here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/04/blip-video-player.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the blog post I say, "vlogs are dead. ;-)"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's a joke, but also ironic since the reason for initially
> > using
> > > > > > > blogs to post video in the first place was a technical one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There wasn't any easy way to post video to the web.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Once I figured out that I could put video in a blog post, I
> > got a
> > > > > > > very easy way to publish videos, along with the added
> > benefits of
> > > > > > > that video being included in a blog post.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But that method, over time, introduced the problems of old
> > videos
> > > > > > > getting lost in archives, and not having an easy way to
> browse
> > > > > > > through videos.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are a lot of companies now bringing to the market ways
> > to make
> > > > > > > it easy to surf videos and I'm glad that blip.tv has given
> > me a way
> > > > > > > to allow people to browse my archives that are hosted with
> > blip.tv.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --Steve
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some details here:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Steve Elbows
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Steve Garfield
> > > > > > > http://SteveGarfield.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > http://michaelverdi.com
> > > > > > http://spinxpress.com
> > > > > > http://freevlog.org
> > > > > > Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > http://michaelverdi.com
> > > http://spinxpress.com
> > > http://freevlog.org
> > > Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>


Reply via email to