This whole thread is very interesting to me, but, due to a dislocated finger I cannot type well right now,
One point is that Michael, Ryann et al, defined vlogs in their book, which surely falls within "real (old) media guidelines" - not to mention anything in Jay's book ... ... richard On 5/1/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/1/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org>> > wrote: > > I always thought Richard BF was too fixated, in an almost unhealthy > > way, on the need to classify videoblogging as a genre and control the > > debate. > > > > It was a strongly held personal point of view, and one that was > > disputed. Personally, I don't agree with him. Many of us do not, > > and not just out of intellectual stupidity or out of some misguided > > romanticism or need to aggrandize the videoblog. And I don't think > > one side has to *win*. > > Careful. Please take into account your personal feelings here when you > go and edit the wikipedia page. Going with the definition that a > videoblog is "video on blog" is also a strongly held, personal point > of view that's been disputed. Using that as the definition effectively > eliminates everything published only on YouTube which is maybe not > such a good idea. Richard's post, while maybe not perfect, at least > allows what most of us do and what some of the people on YouTube do to > be encompassed. > > - Verdi > > -- > http://michaelverdi.com > http://spinxpress.com > http://freevlog.org > Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs > > -- Richard http://richardhhall.org Shows http://richardshow.org http://inspiredhealing.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
