Hey group, The results are back from Mmeiser's proposed Wikipedia ban of pdelongchamp. See what each Wikipedia Administrator had to say about it:
"I fail to see why there should be any consideration of a ban. Unreferenced material is not welcome on Wikipedia." - EdJohnston 23:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC) "Agreed. The argument for a ban reads exactly like 'this person won't let me put original research in the article and this is unfair'" -Amarkov moo! 00:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC) "Agreed as well. I don't see a bit of misbehavior here, let alone anything that calls for a ban. We do not accept unverifiable material or original research, period, and I'll happily buy a beer for anyone that upholds that." -Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC) "Is it just me, and I don't mean to sound bad faith here, or isn't User:MichaelVerdi very knowldgable about this situation for a user with an 11 hour old account? Maybe they editted the pages as an IP? Its just weird that User:MichaelVerdi is the only one supporting Michael Meiser's suggestion. I hope they're aware of WP:MEAT. Apologies if I'm wrongheaded here" -Cailil talk 00:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC) "This is almost nothing but an attack. Close, and archive. I'm going to go ahead and call a spade a spade, and point out that the poster of this complaint has failed to assume good fiath." —Eagle101 Need help? 07:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC) "See no reason for a ban. This is retaliation to the post above. Archive and suggest they cool down and sort this issue out via dispute resolution." -Kzrulzuall Talk• Contribs 07:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Read the full proposed ban here: http://tinyurl.com/2gnhld I hope that we can put the issue to rest and consider that perhaps there's a possibility that I perchance might have perhaps been trying to improve the article and not the other way around. and now ladies and gentlemen, ...your moment of zen. (please accept this as humour with only a tinge of bitterness) "This user - Pdelongchamp - constantly fucks with the entry. [...] It's pathetic. I can't believe Meiser still has the patience to try work on the article as his changes usually get deleted within hours." -Michael Verdi On 5/3/07, pdelongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey group, > The results of the Mmeiser’s Wikipedia ban are here. See what > each Wikipedia Administrator had to say about it: > > “I fail to see why there should be any consideration of a ban. > Unreferenced material is not welcome on Wikipedia.†> - EdJohnston <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EdJohnston> 23:56, 2 > May 2007 (UTC) > > “Agreed. The argument for a ban reads exactly like ‘this > person won't let me put original research in the article and this is > unfair’†> -Amarkov <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amarkov> moo! > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Amarkov> 00:11, 3 May 2007 > (UTC) > > “Agreed as well. I don't see a bit of misbehavior here, let > alone anything that calls for a ban. We do not accept unverifiable > material or original research, period, and I'll happily buy a beer for > anyone that upholds that.†> - Seraphimblade <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seraphimblade> Talk > to me <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Seraphimblade> 00:13, 3 > May 2007 (UTC) > > “Is it just me, and I don't mean to sound bad faith here, or > isn't User:MichaelVerdi <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelVerdi> > very knowldgable about this situation for a user with an 11 hour old > account? Maybe they editted the pages as an IP? Its just weird that > User:MichaelVerdi is the only one supporting Michael Meiser's > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mmeiser> suggestion. I hope they're > aware of WP:MEAT <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:MEAT> . Apologies if > I'm wrongheaded here†> --Cailil <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cailil> talk > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cailil> 00:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC) > > “This is almost nothing but an attack. Close, and archive. I'm > going to go ahead and call a spade a spade, and point out that the > poster of this complaint has failed to assume good fiath > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AGF> .†> â€"â€" Eagle101 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eagle_101> > Need help? <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eagle_101> 07:32, 3 > May 2007 (UTC) > > “See no reason for a ban. This is retaliation to the post above. > Archive and suggest they cool down and sort this issue out via dispute > resolution <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:DR> .†> --Kzrulzuall <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kzrulzuall> Talk > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kzrulzuall> • Contribs > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kzrulzuall> 07:37, > 3 May 2007 (UTC) > > Read the full proposed ban here: http://tinyurl.com/2gnhld > <http://tinyurl.com/2gnhld> > > I hope that we can put the issue to rest and consider that perhaps > there's a possibility that I perchance might have perhaps been trying to > improve the article and not the other way around. > > and now ladies and gentlemen, ...your moment of zen. (please accept this > as humour with only a tinge of bitterness) > > "This user - Pdelongchamp - constantly fucks with the entry. [...] It's > pathetic. I can't believe Meiser still has the patience to try work on > the article as his changes usually get deleted within hours." > -Michael Verdi > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
