finally decided to read this thread through. no comment....
except that i bet we could organize a little crowdfunding effort to pay lan before podtech does. care for some competition, podtech? lan, how much do we need to raise? in cc we hail, sull On 6/28/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Den 28.06.2007 kl. 23:06 skrev Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]<okekai%40gmail.com> > >: > > > To infer all sorts of legal complications only confuses things, and > > keeps PodTech in the one down position publicly speaking. I think your > > point about the Vloggies being cash-negative might be relevant > > internally but came across just plain silly to me here on this list. > > Do you know what this is: > Its the world's smallest violin playing just for PodTech. > > Loosing money on the Vloggies doesn't make PodTech into videoblog > philanthropists. It just makes them really bad at budgetting. Want me to > kiss you on the cheek and give you some milk and cookies? Oh, please. > > Regardless the amount of money you are throwing at other vloggers are > totally irrelevant. You are still not paying Lan. He's trying to run a > business, you like you. (so am I and I have never encountered behavious as > > insane as this) > > Unless PodTech is inferring Lan did not take the photograph in question > (are you?) I fail to see what legal issues there could be. Be a man, > PodTech. Just admit you fucked up and pay the man. If you had done this > right away noone would have thought any less of you. It doesn't even make > sense from a financial standpoint. You have already spent more money in > man-hours trying to weasel yourself out of this situation (and it ain't > working, yo). > > - Andreas > > -- > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
