awesome bottome comparison, thanks! That one wins the "I'm reading this on my not-an-iphone-phone" contest.
I did try to load up the site you recommended on the phone and it does look far and away better than the site i'd been using. Thanks! On 7/9/07, missbhavens1969 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey David, ignore that last message. I think the solution is this: > > The CG6 is a smaller version of the C6 model I have but with a bigger > screen AAC audio and can hold a bigger SD card. The reduction in slim > height is traded for and increase in chubbiness, which would probably > make it easier to hold. > > http://urltea.com/xqz > > The CG65 has all of the above improvements plus records in H.264 > > http://urltea.com/xr0 > > The E1 seems to be a waterproof (for up to an hour) CG65. > > http://urltea.com/xr1 > > I vote for the CG65! > > Bekah > > > > --- In [email protected], "David Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 7/8/07, missbhavens1969 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I would certainly buy another Xacti without reservation. I've been > > > happy with it. > > > > > > > Thats good to know. (also good to hear that the plants aren't > talking over > > you.) > > > > One thing I think Sanyo needs to do is explain the difference > between their > > models better. The description of the C6 and new GC65 read pretty > much the > > same, and except for being able to be tossed in a shallow pool, the E1 > > sounds just same too. > > > > Since I dont expect to be doing underwater video, thats not a huge > selling > > point to me. > > > > So with the underwater thing aside ... whats the difference between > the C6, > > CG65, and E1? At the Sanyo site I'm reading they sound exactly the > same. > > > > - Dave > > > > -- > > http://www.DavidMeade.com > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- http://www.DavidMeade.com
