Quite accurate.

  ;)

--- In [email protected], Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I really don't want to add much more to any of this, except to  
> respond to Chris  and Enric that I don't want what happened on this  
> group to be characterised as people lynching, thrashing, whatevering  
> Podtech.
> 
> Podtech made a mistake, people called on them to do the right thing -  
> they didn't. And they didn't communicate. It dragged on. Podtech dug  
> their own hole.  We called them on their behaviour, and people here  
> were remarkably mature, balanced and restrained.
> 
> Along the way, separate to the discussion here, there were a couple  
> of cheap personal shots at Robert Scoble that were ignored.  And  
> there was a stupid article published by a writer from a valley rag,  
> who doesn't participate in this group (and someone told me he says he  
> hates videoblogs/videobloggers) - he said something like "because  
> people have been begging for it" as an excuse to use this group to  
> promote his poorly researched, bitterly-toned article.  I haven't  
> seen many people here begging for anything like that.
> 
> Part of the reason this all happened, Chris, is because a lot of  
> people thought about Podtech as you do.  I was disappointed and  
> irritated by their actions and indifference to people's concerns -  
> even to people's friendly advice.  Hopefully, they'll get their shit  
> together on their PR and attitude - they seem to be already - and  
> we'll all be better off for it.
> 
> Rupert
> 
> On 28 Jul 2007, at 19:50, [chrisbrogan.com] wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry to see PodTech taking a thrashing in here. I understand the
> different viewpoints, from what I've read (not first hand), but from
> my perspective, they were out there trying some new things and looking
> for a way to make the bridge for people who wanted to make their video
> work a business.
> 
> Again, not saying anything about the deals and any breakdown in
> intentions. My point is simply this: it was nice to see another
> company out there taking a swing at making a viable business out of
> these new media creation methods.
> 
> Watching this group is interesting, because it's this Creature Cantina
> of various opinions, perspectives, goals, and aspirations. Some folks
> just want the medium to be free and open and about personal
> communication. Others are trying to build next-generation TV. Some are
> working on business models. Others could give a rat's ass if they see
> a dime from their video work.
> 
> And yet, we all still come here to hash it out, to learn, and
> apparently, to crap on people.
> 
> Thankfully, people keep on trying.
> 
> --Chris Brogan...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to