My stand on this is that it's up to the traditional television and filmmakers to get creative about documenting this medium, working with us to create more possibilities for sharing our video instead of closing doors. For example: At Vlog Europe, Aske Dam demonstrated a way to put superlow quality videos on the big-screen by superimposing the smaller sized video over the more pixellated larger one. This worked very well. I'm sure there are more solutions than this.
There are solutions, and walking away from what amounts to a vast and valuable archive or web video seems rather foolhardy to me. On 09/09/2007, Frank Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sunday, September 9, 2007, 7:34:20 PM, sankaprods wrote: > > When making a feature film (for theatrical release) you need full > > resolution video, not web video. > > Now I'm puzzled. Your manifesto communique page at > http://www.manifestotv.com/communique/?page_id=27 explicitly states: > > "Do not alter the format of the video, send it in it's original > resolution." > > and makes no mention of any requirement for "full resolution video" > (whatever you may mean by that) > > Does your response to Jay imply that you are simply not interested in > footage from the many of us who shoot and edit at sizes more useful > for digital distribution? I set my camera to record at 320x240. Would you > reject my efforts out of hand? > > Jay's point is still valid. The "future of TV" is not "one size fits > all", and if you are interested in videoblogger footage, why not allow > for direct digital transfer? > > -- > Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- Jeffrey Taylor President and COO, Kinooga Mobile: +33625497654 Skype: thejeffreytaylor Googlechat/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
