--- In [email protected], "David Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Gena, so very few want something different these days. Most are
> content with the usual stuff (garbage) found on YouTube.
> 
> I find it disheartening that there are so few interested in content
> that may be regarded as "alternative vlogs". Trying to reach out to
> those few is a lonely task. 1 hit here. 1 hit there. Very few return.
> I do cherish those that come back again and again though. Those that
> return are generally people that I now call friends. It may just be my
> form of an alternative vlog that people dont find interesting? I dont
> know? If I knew that, your post of "When to let it go..." would be
> easier to answer.
> 
> Regardless. My employer found my sites yesterday and I've been
> informed that if I want to keep working there, I needed to remove them
> (my sites). Strict corporate policy of no "blogs". Yes...I know I
> know. It's not a "blog". They dont care. It's close enough to being
> one. I guess I will be making my decision as to what I am going to do
> over the weekend. I cant afford to be jobless and my site doesnt earn
> me a living.

Does your blog have to do with your work?  If not, how can a company
tell you how to behave outside of your worktime?  If the blog doesn't
relate to your work, you may want to contact the EFF about this:

http://www.eff.org/about/contact/

  -- Enric

> 
> Any ways...yeah. Go the Social Media way and not have a site or have
> your own site and run it the way you want? I would always recommend
> that one have their own site and control their own destiny. You can
> always steal a little here and there from these social media sites and
> incorporate it into your own site. That's always an option.
> 
> David
> http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Gena" <compumavengal@> wrote:
> >
> > Not everyone wants base level content. We have that on M$M. Part of
> > our job is to connect with those folks who do want something
> > different. (I'm especially talking to you David Howell!)
> >
>


Reply via email to