" If I were suspicious about how one is using advertising on their show
and I had some questions about it, I would privately relay my
questions through an email to the right people and keep it there."


She did. Cheryl clearly states in the video that she e-mail Zadi and Steve
about it before recording. Cheryl made the vid knowing that Zadi and Steve
knew about it.

And the video wasn't just about Epic-Fu.

Open discussion is healthy. We all keep saying things behind people's backs,
and it's good to air the dirty laundry once in a while to keep the gossip
and rumors from taking over, and to also resolve conflicts en masse and
perhaps even learn something in the process. This all has been a good thing,
and the way people have discussed has revealed more than the discussion
itself. I've been pleasantly surprised by some, sorely disappointed in
others.



On 24/12/2007, terry.rendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   I asked the question on the Hummingcrow post "Am I the only who
> believes that most of the concerns brought up in this video should
> have been handled privately?"
>
> I have no problem with people giving criticism of others. It helps
> artists grow with when they get feedback, negative or positive. My
> problem with Cheryl's criticism, however, towards Epic Fu was that it
> called into question their business practices. Another problem is at
> one point she calls Steve and Zadi "slick, carefully crafted," which
> in my perception made it personal. In those two areas it crossed the
> line for me.
>
> If I were suspicious about how one is using advertising on their show
> and I had some questions about it, I would privately relay my
> questions through an email to the right people and keep it there. Some
> would say I probably shouldn't even address it privately because it's
> really not my business anyways. If you don't trust something on the
> internet I think the best thing is just not visit the site anymore.
>
> I know many new media people believe in total transparency. However, I
> believe there has to be a limit. There's always going to someone who
> is not satisfied the way you do things (especially if you have large
> audience) and if you have constantly answer peoples concerns that can
> turn extremely exhausting.
>
>  
>



-- 
Jeffrey Taylor
Mobile: +33625497654
Fax: +33177722734
Skype: thejeffreytaylor
Googlechat/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://twitter.com/jeffreytaylor


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to