why bother paying for either ? just dl the bt save your money for beer On Jan 11, 2008 1:08 PM, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would say that unless you are going to do some hardcore motion > graphics Motion > should suit you fine. You ca do a lot of really amazing stuff with Motion. > But AE is still the > tool of choice for pros but probably not worth getting unless you really > need some of the > advanced features, as it would require not just an investment in $ but > also a big > investment in time learning to use it well. > > Bill Streeter > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS > www.lofistl.com > www.billstreeter.net > > --- In [email protected] <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Michael Verdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone have experience with these two? I imagine that AE is > > better but I'm wondering if the new 3D capabilities of Motion 3 will > > be enough (since it come with final cut studio which I'm already > > getting) and another $1000 for AE won't be necessary. What will I be > > missing out on if I only get Motion? > > Thanks, > > Verdi > > > > -- > > http://michaelverdi.com > > http://freevlog.org > > http://nscape.tv > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
