I've used this lav mic a few times and recommend it highly. The spec  
are here:
<http://www.countryman.com/store/product.asp?id=1&catid=10>

I'm selling this one, if you email me from this list I will make a  
better price than I put on craigslist. It's like new, you will love it.
<http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/pho/551791629.html>

Cheers

r

--
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
reliable hosting: http://foo.24x7.com



--- In [email protected], "Cheryl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >
 > I don't own a wireless lav, but I do have an audio technica wired lav
 > that I like very much. I haven't seen anyone mention Shure yet,
 > apologies if I missed it.
 >
 > I used to work in media services at a local college, and had occasion
 > to host an audio workshop with a bunch of uber techies from Shure.
 > Evidently if you buy their gear, they have a free service where
 > they'll look up frequencies for you for certain areas. In other words
 > they take into account things like nearby local news stations and
 > stadium-type venues and help you select frequencies to tune your mics
 > to that are least likely to pick up interference. I don't remember
 > what it was called, or how you access it, and this was 5 yrs ago so
 > things may have changed. But I always thought that was pretty cool.
 > Has anyone else heard of anything like this? Is it common and I'm  
just
 > clueless?
 >
 > Cheryl
 >
 > --- In [email protected], "Richard Amirault"
 > <ramirault@> wrote:
 >
 > > $100 each for a good wireless lav??  Ain't no such animal, sorry.
 > Yes, you
 > > can find some for around that price .. but they are little more  
than
 > toys ..
 > > and unless you use them in a cornfield in Iowa (away from  
cellphones,
 > > computers, pager transmitters and the like) you *will* get  
interference.
 > >
 > > ALSO, you said you want to get two.  Do you want to *use* both at
 > the same
 > > time?? Into the same camera?  That may be a problem also. You'll
 > need both
 > > on different frequencies that will not interer with each other,  
and two
 > > receivers, and then figure out how to combine the output of both
 > receivers
 > > into one plug for your camcorder.
 > >
 > > Richard Amirault
 > > Boston, MA, USA
 > > http://n1jdu.org
 > > http://bostonfandom.org
 > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
 > >
 >





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to