Interesting article today about photojournalism, but I think it also 
applies to video as well.  I always think about criminal cases, when 
does someone alter a digital photo to achive their desired results?  
This is the stuff that scares me about technology, especiality 
digital tech....

http://www.newsweek.com/id/152989

When a mysterious creature washed up on the shores of Montauk, N.Y., 
in late July, it became an instant media sensation. After the 
photograph of the Montauk Monster ran on Manhattan media blog Gawker, 
local Long Island newspapers were on the story. CNN and Fox News 
quickly followed, hosting experts to hash out what exactly this 
unrecognizeable being was. Perhaps a bloated raccoon, as Discover 
Magazine claimed and Jeff Corwin told Fox? A dead dog that had 
decayed for weeks? Or, the latest spin: The creature was simply fake, 
a prop in a movie's viral marketing campaign, and the media had been 
duped. 

The public's skepticism over whether or not they can believe what 
they see in photographs isn't unwarranted. Just last week, Beijing 
organizers admitted to using "previously recorded footage" and 
computerized images during the Olympic opening ceremony to enhance 
the quality of fireworks for broadcast on television. A month before 
that, a doctored photograph of Iranian missiles turned up on front 
pages across the globe. The alteration—an extra missile added to the 
image—was outed within hours of the photograph's publication. "With 
technology, you can make the moment anything you want it to be," says 
John Long, the ethics committee chair for the National Press 
Photographers Association. "Our credibility has been stretched in so 
many ways, so I don't think the public has a great deal of faith in 
us." He admits the past year hasn't been the best for 
photojournalism's credibility but doesn't think the future is 
particularly gloomy—it just puts the burden on the photojournalist to 
tell the truth, rather than on the photograph itself. "Just like we 
trust the reporter to represent what they see accurately, we're going 
to have to develop that same relationship with photographers," he 
says. NEWSWEEK's Sarah Kliff spoke with Long about why the 
credibility of photojournalism has fallen, whether or not doctored 
photographs are more likely to get caught these days, and how 
photographers can reclaim the public's trust. Excerpts:

for the rest of the article follow the link 
http://www.newsweek.com/id/152989

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com

Reply via email to