and even still, i havent seen a single commercial on any csi episode since
i watch all csi on on my dvr

but if i watch anything on the internet if they have a preroll, i have to
watch it in order
to watch whatever i want to watch so.....

those ads are much more valuable and accountable to the clients

the tv ads are worthless

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   Well... and despite all the hype, in traditional TV terms these
> figures are actually not that impressive. Evolution of Dance has been
> "on" every day all day for 18 months and after all that time and
> attention, it's still only had 100 million views. CSI is on once a
> week every week and gets 20 million viewers every time. And that's
> just in the US.
>
> Rupert
> http://twittervlog.tv
>
>
> On 30-Sep-08, at 7:04 AM, Michael Verdi wrote:
>
> Actually, in Mike Wesch's An anthropological introduction to YouTube
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPAO-lZ4_hU> he says his research
> shows that the most common videos uploaded to YouTube are home videos
> meant for less than 100 viewers. This looks like another example of
> the long tail being bigger in aggregate than the hits. Of course since
> each individual video is of little note, even in aggregate they
> largely go unnoticed and their creators neither intend nor make a
> living off of them. People are out there connecting with one another
> through video all the time. And though it doesn't have 10's of
> millions of views, Barack Obama's 37 minute speech on race has been
> watched over 6 million times on YouTube so it isn't all about pop
> stars and skateboarding dogs.
>
> - Verdi
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:23 AM, <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]<thejeffreytaylor%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > In a word? Cheating. This has been documented in the case of the
> Lavigne video, pushed to #1 by rabid fans putting the video on replay.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <jay.dedman%40gmail.com>>
> >
> > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:24:03
> > To: 
> > Videobloggers<[email protected]<videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > Subject: [videoblogging] And the winner is.....
> >
> >
> > Here's a quick rundown of the ten most watched videos on Youtube
> last year.
> > Ill never understand why that "history of dance: keeps being watched.
> > http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/
> top_10_youtube_videos_of_all_time_2008.php
> >
> > Jay
> > ____________________
> > *
> > Top 10 YouTube Videos of All Time, 2008 Edition*
> > Written by Richard MacManus / September 29, 2008 8:40 PM
> >
> > Last year we reviewed YouTube's 10 most popular videos. It's time
> to update
> > that list and see what, if anything, has changed. Last year we
> concluded
> > that 7 of the top 10 videos were music - with 5 of those being
> professional
> > videos. That trend has continued, although there are now no
> amateur music
> > videos in the top 10. There are 6 music videos this year, all of
> them from
> > professional musicians and their record labels.
> >
> > While YouTube became famous from user-generated content, this
> year's top 10
> > list shows that professionals still create the most popular
> content. Of the
> > 4 non-music videos, 2 are comedy (professional comedians), 1 is a
> sappy
> > foreign love story, and the last is a cute baby video. Only the
> baby video
> > seems to be an amateur one.
> >
> > So, what's changed over the last year in terms of rankings? Well
> there is a
> > new number 1. We also now have two videos that have gone over 100
> million
> > views - the top video last year was at 55.8 million. There are 8 new
> > entrants to the top 10, with the only two survivors being numbers
> 1 & 2 (who
> > swapped places this year).
> >
> > Here's the top 10 as of September 2008: [Note: we wanted to embed
> all 10 of
> > them, but curiously 5 of these videos have had embedding disabled
> by YouTube
> > - which is surprising to us, because embedding videos on third
> party sites
> > is one of the best ways to get a video to 'go viral'. I guess the
> video
> > owners think they've already gone viral enough.]
> >
> > --
> > http://jaydedman.com
> > 917 371 6790
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://graymattergravy.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to