I know in many places outside the states this is already in place, 
but here in the states this is somewhat new.  As mentioned in the 
article, Time Warner is doing a test in Texas and Comcast just 
announced some planned changes.  And for those on Satilite, I know 
that there are limits as well.  What concerns me about this company 
is the riduculusly low starting point.  It would discounge those in 
rural areas from accessing anything other than email.  5 gigs?!?!?  
that is just crazy.....we have to stop this now or we will give up 
the abiltiy to use the net how we have.....I mean vlogging will go 
bye, bye, heck photo sharing would be tough at 5 gigs!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27519819/

Heath

The artist 

www.batmangeek.com

NEW YORK - Phone company Frontier Communications Co. will probably 
charge its subscribers a dollar or two per gigabyte of Internet 
traffic if they go over the monthly allotments the company plans to 
introduce next year, Frontier's chief executive said Friday.

The company is at the forefront of what CEO Maggie Wilderotter 
believes is a trend among Internet service providers toward billing 
for the amount of data subscribers use, rather than all-you-can-eat 
monthly plans.

Frontier provides service mainly in rural areas of 25 states. 
Rochester, New York, is its largest market.

The company caused confusion and some dismay among customers earlier 
this year, when it said it would charge for Internet use above 5 
gigabytes per month, starting next year.

U.S. Internet users have no experience with tracking their usage. 
There have been few caps in place on downloads, and the existing caps 
have been so high that they affected only a tiny fraction of users.

Frontier's planned cap would apply to the total amount of data that 
users download and upload in a given month. A traffic allowance of 5 
gigabytes is enough for thousands of Web pages, or tens of thousands 
of e-mails, but could be exceeded by the download of three DVD-
quality movies.

Wilderotter said Frontier was looking at providing higher monthly 
limits, perhaps 20 gigabytes per month, in more urban markets like 
Rochester and Elk Grove, California, where usage is higher than rural 
areas.

The company will also sell plans with higher download caps for higher 
prices, Wilderotter told The Associated Press, at increments like 10, 
20 and 50 gigabytes.

That sort of tiered pricing for Internet usage is being tested in 
Texas by Time Warner Cable Inc., which is also Frontier's competitor 
in Rochester.

"All networks are going to have to move to that paradigm in order to 
stay profitable," Wilderotter said at a conference in New York.

"The business model that we're using today really has our light users 
subsidizing our heavy users," she said.

Internet usage can vary enormously from household to household. As an 
example, Wilderotter said 23 of its customers take up 28 percent of 
the network capacity in a town in West Virginia.

Charging the heavy users more is fairer and makes sure that the 
company gets a return on investments in capacity upgrades, she said.

The change to usage-based pricing, if it gains momentum, could have 
implications for companies like Netflix Inc. and Apple Inc. that are 
selling movie downloads, since those take up a lot of capacity.


Reply via email to