I'd like to sit in on that call...

Great stuff.

peace,
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com



On Nov 15, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Jan McLaughlin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Brainstorming a bit.
>
> Seems to me that you might - via a desktop sharing application and  
> Audacity
> (or whatever you're using to record audio on your computer) - be  
> able to
> approach both 'live recording' and 'quality' together. Don't know  
> if desktop
> sharing would have the same kind of audio compression / latency as  
> Skype.
> Might be interesting to find out.
>
> Tried Gmail's audio / video chat recently and the audio quality was  
> pretty
> darned good. None of the Skype echo or weird digital hash  
> hesitations. If
> may be that Verdi and I both have good connections. I have FIOS.
>
> Maybe iChat or any other video conference app in combination with  
> CamTwist
> (Google it), playing back the pre-recorded video in the chat window  
> so you
> can sync the audio performance to the vid.
>
> What OS do each of you have?
>
> If the double-ender strategy appeals and you're bound and  
> determined to use
> better-quality mics, I should think you wouldn't need 'recorders',  
> but only
> a free recording application like Audacity, and a preamp or other  
> bit of
> hardware to put between the mics and the computer, in order to get  
> the mic
> signal where it needs to be to be 'heard' by the computer.
>
> Because of your post, I broke out a Shure FP-11 mic to line amp  
> (new from
> Ebay for $135) and hooked it up with a dynamic headset mic and it's  
> working
> okay - with a bit more hiss than I'd prefer - but still much better  
> than the
> on-board MacBook Pro mic and associated computer noise well in the
> foreground of the background.
>
> Podcasters would be well placed to tell you which USB mics would  
> get you the
> quality you need. I'm certain there are 'good' USB mics out there  
> for well
> less than $100 a piece.
>
> You can certainly pick up a Shure SM57 or two used for less than  
> $100 each.
> The Shure mic you later mention - the SM7B - for sure isn't in the  
> budget
> you describe. The SM57's should be plenty good enough for the web,  
> with the
> added benefit of rejecting most ambient room noise (like echo,
> refrigerators, air conditioners, traffic and the neighbors' argument).
>
> Another idea is that one or both of you may have a video camera  
> handy to use
> as a mic, attached and recorded to the computer via fireware or  
> USB. There
> IS the some time problem of camera noise associated with recording  
> audio
> with inboard mics on video cameras, but it's usually not THAT much  
> of a
> problem for lo-budge web purposes.
>
> Toward the lo-budget side, you can always write the story so that  
> one (or
> both) of the characer's voice(s) are supposed to be 'futzed' -  
> e.g., EQ'd so
> they sound as if they're on a telephone.
>
> Call me if you want, and I'll walk you through some more ideas.  
> 862-571-5334
> Better these discussions held in real time. Texting possibilities  
> without
> knowing precisely what you have / want is not an efficient use of  
> our time
> :)
>
> Jan
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Richard Amirault  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dom"
> > (snip)
> > > The video portion will utilize voice-over while our content plays
> > > beneath. We may also use animation or puppets along with our  
> voices.
> > > Anyway, you can see that it would be less than ideal to have the
> > > voices at different qualities. Are there any tools for  
> recording two
> > > audio streams live from two separate locations that don't involve
> > > thousands of dollars of audio equipment? Thanks folks!
> > >
> > As suggested a "double ender" will work just fine. How "low cost"  
> it is
> > depends on what your definition of "cost" is. You will need quality
> > recorders. A pair of Zoom H-2s will work great. Do not use  
> anything like a
> > "digital voice recorder" from Olympus or Sony.
> >
> > I'm not sure about the video aspect of this. Will you both need  
> to see the
> > video to comment on it? I would think that this may be a problem.  
> You both
> > need to see the same thing at the same time.
> >
> > Richard Amirault
> > Boston, MA, USA
> > http://n1jdu.org
> > http://bostonfandom.org
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> Jan McLaughlin
> Production Sound Mixer
> air = 862-571-5334
> aim = janofsound
> skype = janmclaughlin
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to