How is this even being discussed as an option in the USA? Surely this is rather decisively forbidden by the first amendment?
On 6-Oct-09, at 2:51 PM, Markus Sandy wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:38 AM, elbowsofdeath wrote: > > > I have not yet had time to read the full arguments of those who are > > against this, though I start from the position of viewing their > > stance with quite some skepticism. > > I think the handwriting on the wall is pretty clear: > > Make blogging something for only insured and licensed professionals > under the guise of protecting people. > > markus > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
