cool

 

I am not saying that the group project is not great ...

 

this is just my opinion..I think we are shortening the original Navloplomo 
deal...I see it like retreating instead of keep on trying to make a video a day 
per videoblogger..

 

I do remember it was taken as a CHALLENGE...and thats one of the reasons I got 
interested bout it

 

John Dkar

 

 

http://www.twitwall.com/johndkarfilms

 

http://www.twitter.com/JohnDkarFilms

 

http://www.facebook.com/johndkarfilms

 

http://www.youtube.com/JohnDkar

 

 

 

 


 
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> From: drpoule...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:56:09 +0000
> Subject: [videoblogging] Re: NaVloPoMo 2009-we should -still try 1 video a day
> 
> I may do one a day, too, but I will definitely play the game with everyone 
> else. I think it will be a great "group project".
> 
> I look forward to seeing what you do, John.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> www.ymimexico.org/vlog
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Cardenas <johndkarfi...@...> wrote:
> >
> > one video a day is much better�..it looks great to�have�a variety of 
> > videobloggers trying to post their videos everyday ...I will keep on with 
> > the traditional- 1 video a day for November2009-�from my youtube 
> > channel...
> > �
> > regards
> > �
> > John Dkar
> > �
> > http://www.youtube.com/JohnDkar
> > �
> > http://twitwall.com/johndkarfilms
> > �
> > http://twitter.com/JohnDkarFilms
> > �
> > �
> > �
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail 
you.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to