excellent - i can have a thread all to myself. well, Rupert, it seems to me after a moment's consideration that the Stereo videomic is probably better for atmosphere and group discussions, whereas the more directional mono videomic would be better for interview use. does that sound right? Yes, Rupert, that would seem to make sense. Thanks. No problem.
On 31 Mar 2010, at 12:37, Rupert Howe wrote: > here's another general question for the audiophiles like Richard - is > there really much difference between a mono and a stereo mic at this > level? surely in most cases - recording someone talking, or capturing > general atmos for instance, both channels will be almost exactly the > same? and the range and response isn't improved by having stereo, is > it? what am i missing? > > > On 31 Mar 2010, at 12:30, Rupert Howe wrote: > >> Does anybody have any experience comparing the quality of the Rode >> mono & stereo videomics? I know they're popular with videobloggers. >> >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
