didnt follow it. where's a good source of this coverage?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:17 PM, elbowsofdeath <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> So I hear the Streamy's this year were a disaster in several key ways and
> have gotten all the wrong sort of attention as a result.
>
> There is some concern that it has damaged the image of the 'industry',
> although it may be easy to overstate this point. It certainly didnt help,
> but the 'industry' has enough other problems too, although anything that
> harms potential sponsorship by appearing to confirm potential sponsors worst
> fears (eg uncontrolled juvenile amateurish smut tarnishing their brands)
> sounds bad to me.
>
> Unfortunately there is a part of me that is wildly entertained and amused
> by the streamyfail, considering it to be some kind of justice on a certain
> level. This isnt fair, as no doubt lots of blameless hard working people
> have been hurt by the streamyfail, but I suppose its a natural consequence
> of my disdain for the way some of the more visible parts of the 'industry'
> went, shoddy emulation of the existing media. What better way to symbolise
> two worlds colliding, and so much wasted potential, than to have a slick
> awards show humbled by technical glitches and naked people.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve Elbows
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
