24 hours a minute. the current stats on youtube uploads. who besides me was surprised at the suggestion that the plethora of videos on youtube was a clear and present danger to the porn guys that built the net .
voyuers are what they are, no matter how they find what you have to offer. --- In [email protected], David Jones <david.jo...@...> wrote: > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:22 AM, daredolls <dared...@...> wrote: > > > > our work, like 50% or so of what is on youtube, does not pass the church > > lady standard. all you have to do to get a competitor's product removed > > from youtube is flag it as innappropriate. a pornographic producer took > > offense at our million channel views in 4 months and started flagging us. > > has been flagging us for 4 years. his pornography is still there, we could > > return the favor and start a flagging war but we have not. that, by the > > way, was youtube's suggestion as to how we handle this. > > > > we can't even protest use of our video by others because our company name > > is banned from youtube and to file a copyright complaint it has to be in > > the name of the rights holder. > > I greatly doubt you can be stopped from filing a DMCA notice. > > Also, if someone on Youtube is using your material then join under > another name and then provide proof of your rights to the work and > start flagging away. You don't have to have a channel in your company > name, you just need to prove ownership to the work. > > Dave. >
