I bought 51 Blu-rays back in March, in part because I'd gotten several requests 
to purchase some, in part because I wanted to conduct a small trial.  Part of 
the way I justified trying out Blu-ray was that I bought also bought regular 
DVDs of anything that I bought in Blu-ray.  So if a student said, "No fair, I 
don't have Blu-ray," we could say, "We have the film in regular DVD format."

Though our Blu-rays circulate, they don't circulate extremely well and the 
circs don't appear to be growing.   One Avatar, for example, circulated 21 
times in regular DVD format.  So far, it's circulated 5 times in Blu-ray.  For 
some of the older films, the circs are a bit more even: Raging Bull, in 
Blu-ray, has circulated twice since March.  In regular format, it has 
circulated four times.  On the flip side, I have gotten some anecdotal feedback 
from students who think it's "cool" to offer Blu-ray, and we've ILL'd more of 
the Blu-ray than we have the DVD counterpart.

Like many, I think the data show that access often trumps quality. I don't 
really feel sorry about getting Blu-ray though, because it's not really an 
access versus quality paradigm.  To me, it's a now versus --maybe if we're 
lucky-- ten years from now paradigm. Of course any library that could (legally) 
purchase Avatar online and offer it to its patrons, would do so.  But why do we 
keep comparing something like Oliver Stone's Malcolm X with an online PBS 
Malcolm X?  So, Blu-ray may not be about fulfilling the best option, as much as 
it is about listening to patron input, and determining if it can serve as a 
small part of the option.  I think that each library needs to think about 
Blu-ray on its own terms.

Mary.

Mary Hanlin
Media Collection Development Librarian
Tidewater Community College
P: 757.822.2133
F: 757.822.2149
[email protected]




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael May
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 1:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Blu-Ray in libraries

I've been buying Blu-rays for my medium-sized public library for almost two 
years, and they circulate well. We have one Blu-ray viewing station, too.

Rather than replacing DVDs, the Blu-rays compliment or supplement our DVDs. 
Generally I buy Blu-rays when we have 15 or more patron requests for titles on 
DVD, usually the newest box-office hits, about 5 to 10 Blu-rays per month. If I 
had more money, I'd buy older, better reviewed releases on Blu-ray, but patron 
demand and title availability for DVDs far outweigh Blu-rays.

Mike

Michael May
Adult Services Librarian
Carnegie-Stout Public Library
360 West 11th Street
Dubuque, IA 52001-4697, USA
Phone: 563-589-4225 ext. 2244
Fax: 563-589-4217
Email: [email protected]
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Pamela Bristah [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Videolib] Blu-Ray in libraries

A perennial question, but a good one to revisit to from time to time:

Are you purchasing Blu-Ray titles for your library, or are you holding off?  
(I'm especially interested in hearing from college and university libraries, 
since we're in the same boat.)

If you're purchasing, what criteria do you use?  Do you re-purchase titles you 
have on DVD, or only new titles?

Having just about completed switching the collection from VHS to DVD, the 
thought of moving next to Blu-Ray makes me want to lie down and go to sleep, 
for about 45 years.  And, the cost would be prohibitive.

Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if libraries could go straight from DVD to 
streaming video, at Blu-Ray image quality?  For feature films, not just 
educational and documentary titles?  Oh well, a girl can dream.
______________
Pamela Bristah, Collections Librarian, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, 
Wellesley MA 02481
phone 781-283-2076, fax 781-283-2869, 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any access, use, 
disclosure or distribution of this email message by anyone other than the 
intended recipient(s) is unauthorized and prohibited. If you are not an 
intended recipient (or an agent acting on an intended recipient's behalf), 
please contact the sender by reply email and immediately destroy all copies of 
the original message. Virus scanning is recommended on all email attachments.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to