FYI

Sent from my iPad


U. of Michigan Tests Murky Waters of Copyright Law by Offering Digital Access 
to Some ‘Orphan’ Books

June 23, 2011, 7:31 pm

By Jeff Young<http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/author/jyoung>

The University of Michigan has taken an unprecedented step into a murky area of 
copyright law in the name of making thousands of its library books available to 
campus users in digital form. At least one publishing official calls the new 
practice illegal, while others say it could help solve the thorny issue of 
so-called “orphan works,” books in copyright whose owners are unknown.


On Thursday the library announced that books in its digital collection that 
have been identified as orphans after a careful search for a copyright owner 
will be available for reading online—but only to users on campus. Hundreds of 
thousands of books in the library have been scanned as part of the university’s 
partnership with Google, which is working with several major libraries to build 
a comprehensive digital collection. The books are now searchable in a public 
online database<http://www.hathitrust.org/>, but full electronic text of the 
orphan books have never been shared with users because of concerns about 
whether copyright law allows such digital access.


“These books were meant to be read, and we want to make them easier to read,” 
said Paul Courant, dean of libraries at the University of Michigan, in an 
interview on Thursday. “All we’re doing is making them available to our 
students, faculty, and staff who could already come into the library and read 
these books. I don’t see why anybody would be against this.”

But at least one publishing official is already raising concerns about the plan.


“Mr. Courant may believe this step is justified under fair use, but as far as I 
know, there is nothing in either the copyright statute or the case law to 
justify such a sweeping claim,” said Peter Givler, executive director of the 
Association of American University Presses, in an e-mail. “We all know that 
orphan works are a problem, and we would all benefit from a good solution. The 
plain fact is, though, that their orphan status isn’t determined by the elfin 
whimsy of private parties, but federal law. It’s up to Congress to fix it, not 
Google or the University of Michigan.”

Mr. Courant bristled at the characterization of his library’s effort. “I plead 
not guilty of elfin whimsy,” he said, noting that the library has set up a 
careful, time-consuming, and expensive procedure to determine whether a book is 
truly orphaned—an effort it announced in 
May.<http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/u-of-michigan-copyright-sleuths-start-new-project-to-investigate-orphan-works/31348>


<http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/u-of-michigan-copyright-sleuths-start-new-project-to-investigate-orphan-works/31348>

The university plans to make bibliographic information about books it 
identifies as orphans available on a public Web site, and if any publisher or 
copyright owner sees one of its books being used without permission and comes 
forward, librarians will work with them to resolve the issue. “We want the 
process to be extremely open and visible, with bright lights shining 
everywhere,” Mr. Courant said. The goal, he added, is to figure out a way to 
“do a reliable, robust job of tracking down the foster parents of these orphan 
works.”


He said he hopes that because most of the material is scholarly, or otherwise 
never had big sales commercially, that copyright owners who do emerge from the 
woodwork will agree to make the books available digitally for free under a 
Creative Commons license. “If somebody calls me up and tells me my Great Aunt 
Minnie published a monograph on how to play piano, and would I mind if it were 
used by Stanford University library, I’d say hot damn,” he said, noting that he 
would quickly agree to free access.


“My attorney says this is legitimate under fair use,” said Mr. Courant. “When 
people find ways of making things better for people without harming anybody 
else, I think they ought to do that. I really do.”


The electronic copies of the books are stored online in a joint effort with 
other universities called the HathiTrust Digital Library, which has a total of 
6.4 million books that are not in the public domain. Not all of those are 
orphans, but one recent estimate found that more than two million of those 
books are orphans. Such books are effectively in digital limbo because their 
owners cannot be found to ask permission for digital use.

The university expects the first orphan e-books to become available to 
on-campus readers through the new effort starting in October.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to