Hi Maureen,

Great questions, a topic dear to my heart!  There are multiple definitions
for each depending on perspective, each with varying approaches (which gets
to the pedagogical means of developing these skill sets, and I believe for
Libraries, a framework for articulating related programmatic support).

Media Literacy: Here is a website I recently developed that helps define
media literacy, including approaches for instructors to integrating these
concepts into teaching and learning:
http://www.lib.umn.edu/media/teachingmedialiteracy Media Assignments:
http://www.lib.umn.edu/media/assignmentsupport Case Studies:
http://www.lib.umn.edu/media/profiles

Our program has been heavily inspired by Kellner and Shares (2007), who
articulated 4 approaches, three of which I think of as true approaches
(family values approach..not so much): Media Arts Education (creative
production, aesthetic appreciation), Media Literacy Movement (locating,
accessing, analyzing media as one would print, mainly in popular mass
contexts - not as deep as critical media literacy) and Critical Media
Literacy Approach (as Gary suggested, MEF territory; a critical reading of
media (in all forms) and representations, also including alternative forms
of production and communication).

There is a lot of overlap with the other "new literacies" (e.g., visual,
aural, digital).

Digital Literacy:  I have found that older concepts tend to define digital
literacy more as having the skill sets to utilize technology to access
information and communicate in a digital environment, while more modern
concept tend to define digital literacy as the ability to traverse and
understand information in a digital (online) envirionment.

Transliteracy:  I'll leave this wild territory for Tom Ipri:
http://crln.acrl.org/content/71/10/532.full

I'd be happy to discuss further offline.

Best,
Scott





On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:07 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send videolib mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/[email protected]
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of videolib digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. media/digital/transliteracy? (Maureen Tripp)
>   2. Re: media/digital/transliteracy? (Jessica Rosner)
>   3. Re: media/digital/transliteracy? ([email protected])
>   4. Re: media/digital/transliteracy? (Ball, James (jmb4aw))
>   5. Re: media/digital/transliteracy? ([email protected])
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:19:31 -0500
> From: Maureen Tripp <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I have been asked to talk to faculty about some version of these
> "literacies", and suggest some ways our library help our students become
> more media/digital, or trans literate.
> My first question:  what is the difference between these terms?
> And the second is like it:  what is the preferred term?
> And finally, if anyone has any ideas about programs or services that might
> support development of said literacies, I'd love to hear them.  Thanks, as
> always, o collective wisdom!
>
> Maureen Tripp
> Media Librarian
> Iwasaki Library
> 120 Boylston Street
> Boston, MA 02116
> [email protected]
> (617)824-8407
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
> HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:36:25 -0500
> From: Jessica Rosner <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>        <CACRe6m9mPmANQcwqKQ3vuHwFDyh35KWWmG2ThCFnXzEXf0z=x...@mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> A little confused. Are you asking the difference between the terms media &
> Digital or media digital and trans literate. I have no idea what the last
> term means.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Maureen Tripp <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >  I have been asked to talk to faculty about some version of these
> > ?literacies?, and suggest some ways our library help our students become
> > more media/digital, or trans literate.
> > My first question:  what is the difference between these terms?
> > And the second is like it:  what is the preferred term?
> > And finally, if anyone has any ideas about programs or services that
> might
> > support development of said literacies, I?d love to hear them.  Thanks,
> as
> > always, o collective wisdom!
> >
> > Maureen Tripp
> > Media Librarian
> > Iwasaki Library
> > 120 Boylston Street
> > Boston, MA 02116
> > [email protected]
> > (617)824-8407
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
> > issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
> > control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
> > libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
> as
> > an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
> > communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
> > producers and distributors.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jessica Rosner
> Media Consultant
> 224-545-3897 (cell)
> 212-627-1785 (land line)
> [email protected]
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
> HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:46:43 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
>
> Cool!
>
> Yeah...I think there are major and significant differences between
> "digital literacy" and "media literacy" (the latter sometimes referred to
> as visual literacy")
>
> This is my thinking:  Digital literacy comprises two types of
> understanding:
> technical and content/critical.  The former has to do with the physical
> act of negotiating the complex terrain of devices, databases,
> etc.--knowing how to push the buttons and make the digital dog jump thru
> hoops. Knowing the apposite uses and limits of the technology. The latter
> has to do with the critical assessment of the content contained in the
> digital domain:  how to read and assess web resources and other online
> content; how to effectively (and ethically) use digital content in
> research and learning.
>
> Media literacy (or visual literacy)has to do with the critical "reading"
> and assessment of the images (and sounds) offered up via various media
> (including online)...in other words, MEF territory:  how to understand the
> ways in which various media work us over, inform our lives, shape the
> world.   Understanding the grammar, syntax, and semiotics of media
> images...the movies and docs and the news and sitcoms and everything else
> that moves on the screen. Understanding the politics and means of media
> manipulation and distribution.
>
> At least that's my take.
>
> Gary
>
>
> > I have been asked to talk to faculty about some version of these
> > "literacies", and suggest some ways our library help our students become
> > more media/digital, or trans literate.
> > My first question:  what is the difference between these terms?
> > And the second is like it:  what is the preferred term?
> > And finally, if anyone has any ideas about programs or services that
> might
> > support development of said literacies, I'd love to hear them.  Thanks,
> as
> > always, o collective wisdom!
> >
> > Maureen Tripp
> > Media Librarian
> > Iwasaki Library
> > 120 Boylston Street
> > Boston, MA 02116
> > [email protected]
> > (617)824-8407
> >
> >
> >
> > VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
> > issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
> > control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
> > libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
> > as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel
> of
> > communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
> > producers and distributors.
> >
>
>
> Gary Handman
> Director
> Media Resources Center
> Moffitt Library
> UC Berkeley
>
> 510-643-8566
> [email protected]
> http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC
>
> "I have always preferred the reflection of life to life itself."
> --Francois Truffaut
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:50:08 +0000
> From: "Ball, James (jmb4aw)" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <
> 302d2154cd0ea448aef4b356e860542701463...@reagan.eservices.virginia.edu>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Transliteracy is kinda the same as Information Literacy, but without so
> much bias as to the information source.  Images, websites, Twitter, film...
> it's all fair game in Transliteracy.  The idea is to be able to apply the
> principals of access, evaluation and use across formats.  This definition
> was given at a talk recently:
>
> "the ability to read, write and interact across a range of platforms,
> tools and media..."
>
> Brian Hulsey was the presenter:
> http://librariesandtransliteracy.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/transliteracies-libraries-as-the-critical-%e2%80%9cclassroom%e2%80%9d-computers-in-libraries-2011/
>
> Matt
>
> ______________________________
> Matt Ball
> Media Services Librarian
> University of Virginia
> [email protected]<
> https://mail.eservices.virginia.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=f9bb9e66e0cb45eb9c98da126198ad7e&URL=mailto%3amattball%40virginia.edu
> >
> 434-924-3812
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Maureen Tripp
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:20 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
>
> I have been asked to talk to faculty about some version of these
> "literacies", and suggest some ways our library help our students become
> more media/digital, or trans literate.
> My first question:  what is the difference between these terms?
> And the second is like it:  what is the preferred term?
> And finally, if anyone has any ideas about programs or services that might
> support development of said literacies, I'd love to hear them.  Thanks, as
> always, o collective wisdom!
>
> Maureen Tripp
> Media Librarian
> Iwasaki Library
> 120 Boylston Street
> Boston, MA 02116
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> (617)824-8407
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
> HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:07:45 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
>
> My personal feeling is that the "transliteracy" concept is a major crock
> (yet another!).  The implicit assumption behind this notion is that all
> content served digitally somehow has equal cultural, intellectual, or
> cognitive valence...that, somehow, the means of delivery is the message
> (thank you very, much Mr. McL)--or at least the most salient issue.  The
> attempt to apply "principles of access and evaluation across formats" is
> unspeakably wrongheaded...the fact of the matter is that, if you focus on
> the nature of media content (rather than content delivery) it's abundantly
> clear that each medium has it's own unique set of rules, uses and misuses,
> grammar, and history.  The fact that all this stuff is increasingly shoved
> over wires doesn't obviate the need to deal with each medium as unique.
> Students (and others) don't usually make these kinds of distinction:  some
> would view that as a good thing...I view it as catastrophic.
>
> Gary H.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Transliteracy is kinda the same as Information Literacy, but without so
> > much bias as to the information source.  Images, websites, Twitter,
> > film... it's all fair game in Transliteracy.  The idea is to be able to
> > apply the principals of access, evaluation and use across formats.  This
> > definition was given at a talk recently:
> >
> > "the ability to read, write and interact across a range of platforms,
> > tools and media..."
> >
> > Brian Hulsey was the presenter:
> >
> http://librariesandtransliteracy.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/transliteracies-libraries-as-the-critical-%e2%80%9cclassroom%e2%80%9d-computers-in-libraries-2011/
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > ______________________________
> > Matt Ball
> > Media Services Librarian
> > University of Virginia
> > [email protected]<
> https://mail.eservices.virginia.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=f9bb9e66e0cb45eb9c98da126198ad7e&URL=mailto%3amattball%40virginia.edu
> >
> > 434-924-3812
> >
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maureen Tripp
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:20 PM
> > To: '[email protected]'
> > Subject: [Videolib] media/digital/transliteracy?
> >
> > I have been asked to talk to faculty about some version of these
> > "literacies", and suggest some ways our library help our students become
> > more media/digital, or trans literate.
> > My first question:  what is the difference between these terms?
> > And the second is like it:  what is the preferred term?
> > And finally, if anyone has any ideas about programs or services that
> might
> > support development of said literacies, I'd love to hear them.  Thanks,
> as
> > always, o collective wisdom!
> >
> > Maureen Tripp
> > Media Librarian
> > Iwasaki Library
> > 120 Boylston Street
> > Boston, MA 02116
> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > (617)824-8407
> >
> >
> >
> > VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
> > issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
> > control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
> > libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
> > as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel
> of
> > communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
> > producers and distributors.
> >
>
>
> Gary Handman
> Director
> Media Resources Center
> Moffitt Library
> UC Berkeley
>
> 510-643-8566
> [email protected]
> http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC
>
> "I have always preferred the reflection of life to life itself."
> --Francois Truffaut
>
>
>
>
> End of videolib Digest, Vol 49, Issue 9
> ***************************************
>



-- 
Scott Spicer
Media Outreach and Learning Spaces Librarian
University of Minnesota Libraries - Twin Cities
341 Walter Library
[email protected]    612.626.0629
Media Services: lib.umn.edu/media
SMART Learning Commons: smart.umn.edu
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to