Hi Jessica -
If tonality came off as harsh for not offering, then I apologize. The intent 
was to cover things objectively as a "state of the union." 
I agree with you 100% - and many of these smaller 
distributers/producers/providers, etc. are favs of mine. On some accounts, 
their mention was 
something of a name drop to build awareness so that catalogs might be checked 
out and awareness to them brought - as much as my article last year 
discussed New Yorker Films who at that time was out of business (i wanted to 
draw some attention to them, their catalog, and that).
To this extent, the ability to offer streaming isn't meant to be a negative 
either - perhaps even viewed as a comment in its own right - and meant to 
for information purposes. 
I too am a huge proponent of coming up with an approach that sidesteps a big 
dog distributor (as content provider) and would like to see libraries
work with small companies in an effort to develop a model that, quite 
efficiently, might eliminate such middle men - and remove them of some
"power." Whether that be through catalog access or a la cart style (title by 
title) purchasing. 

ben




-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Rosner <[email protected]>
To: videolib <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Dec 6, 2011 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Long article on streaming video on Library Journal 
online


Ben,
I think you are a bit hard on companies that "don't offer" streaming. Most of 
the small companies you site don't likely have enough of market to set up their 
own streaming system. In most cases they do offer streaming rights for 
libraries that want to do it on their own system ( FYI I don't think Kino 
Lorber offer direct streaming only rights but someone can correct me on that). 
Rights issues can be particularly vexing for small companies specializing in 
educational/ independent and especially foreign films. Old contracts need to be 
redone in many cases and rights generally have a fixed period for which the 
company can stream the film ( or do anything else). Contracts expire and thus 
rights expire unlike the vast majority of studio titles. For obvious reasons a 
small company that might have anywhere from 50 to 500 titles in its collection 
has to have a different model than studios or netflix with have tens or 
hundreds of thousands.

Small companies are committed to working with libraries both public and 
academic so their films can be seen & used at a reasonable price but tech and 
rights issues are a problem.

Regards

Jessica


On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Deg,
 
As the author of that piece I wanted to thank you for agreeing with most of the 
article (we have that in common), and for also 
addressing educational aspects as part of the WHOLE media discussion - it is 
certainly an integral part of the picture, was considered as such, and will 
hopefully result in future coverage. Frankly, in this format, there was way too 
much to talk about. My research took many more factors into consideration and 
along those lines I easily could've added 5k more words of coverage, this, plus 
the fact that the topic is/was so much "in active development" due to 
constantly changing "this just in" information it often felt as though i was 
reporting on where a clock's second hand has been 5 minutes ago. So you go with 
what you can and attempt to put it and its context into perspective as best you 
can - even though there is always the fear that such live information might 
leap directly from your monitor into a bin of irrelevancy. The intent of this 
piece was more for, as you mentioned, entertainment purposes with a mind 
towards establishing base level education of how things work so that we might 
encourage and nurture elaboration on many different levels. This wasn't to 
slight. I'm pushing to get more of, well,  EVERYTHING going on the topic 
(discussion, dialogue, camaraderie, support, interest, understanding, 
representation, conference presentations [physical and virtual], etc.) and i 
hope attention given to and stemming from works like this will help to do so. 
Let's keep it going. Thanks - Ben



-----Original Message-----
From: Deg Farrelly <[email protected]>
To: videolib <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Dec 6, 2011 3:47 pm
Subject: [Videolib] Long article on streaming video on Library Journal online


Here:
http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/newsletters/newsletterbucketljxpress/892497-441/still_loading__av_spotlight.html.csp
I don't disagree with much of the article, but the focus is almost entirely on 
ntertainment.  I wrote a long, rambling comment, but so far I am the only one….
Join the fray!
-deg

-
eg farrelly
rizona State University
.O. Box 871006
empe, AZ 85287
hone:  480.965.1403
mail:  [email protected]
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
elating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
reservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
elated institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
orking tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
ibraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.





-- 
Jessica Rosner
Media Consultant
224-545-3897 (cell)
212-627-1785 (land line)
[email protected]



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
elating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
reservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
elated institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
orking tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between 
ibraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to