Since my name was mentioned, I need to reply to this mention of the
VRT's Fair Use and Video, Community Practices in the Fair Use of Video
in Libraries.  This publication did not come out until this week so I
could not have commented on it a year ago.  I received it on the VRT
listserv.  I was not part of the group surveyed so I did not have any
input into the community of practices.   deg beat me in posting it to
the listserv.  I had not even mentioned it to deg.  I have discussed it
only in my CIP course on copyright that I'm currently taking with
Kimberly Bonner.  I suggest everyone take that course as you can never
be "too educated" in copyright.  I am finding the course very helpful in
my work with faculty and my university.

 

I do have a comment though.  On reading the case studies, case 4, course
based streaming says in their fair use argument that "the nature of the
copyrighted work.  Section 110(2) allows for the streaming of entire
non-dramatic works, so documentaries are entirely covered by this
statute."  I believe they left out a word and that word is important, it
should read "Section 110(2) allows for the streaming of entire
non-dramatic "literary" works..."  This puts an entirely picture on
streaming entire non-dramatic works.  

 

If I am reading this incorrectly, please let me know.  Thanks, Jane

 

Jane B. Hutchison

Associate Director
Member

Instruction & Research Technology                          CCUMC:
Leadership in Media & Academic Technology

William Paterson University
http://www.ccumc.org

Wayne, NJ 07470

973-720-2980 (work)

973-418-7727 (cell)

973-720-2585 (facs)

[email protected]

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Norris
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 10:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Fair use and video document

 

Interesting that Jane Hutchison comment on the almost year old article
the day before deg posted it. Correlated?

 

The us vs. them language seems natural to me in an article devoted to
exploiting fair use to the fullest. Overall seemed on target to me.

 

Claire Stewart, member of the working group and fellow Evanstonian,
coauthored Intellectual Property Law & Interactive Media, Free For A Fee
if you want to further devote your life to copyright law.

 

Robert A. Norris

Managing Director

Film Ideas, Inc.

Phone:   (847) 419-0255

Email:    [email protected]

Web:       www.filmideas.com <http://www.filmideas.com/> 

 

On May 2, 2012, at 8:40 PM, [email protected] wrote:

         

        From: Dennis Doros <[email protected]>

        Date: May 2, 2012 8:40:48 PM CDT

        To: [email protected]

        Subject: Re: [Videolib] Fair use and video document

        Reply-To: [email protected]

        
        
        Well, deg's right that it'll probably cause some consternation
among "my" people -- it's definitely inflammatory in its descriptions of
distributors and the us versus them rhetoric and who "owns" the
copyright law. I do appreciate the line near the end "Not a single
librarian revealed herself as being either cavalier about the law or
dismissive of the market" and know it to be the case among most but it
would be nice to have some of the discussions we've had here about the
balancing the needs of education versus the sustainability of producing
new content. The lack thereof makes me want to set up fishing dates with
Gary. :-)

         

        Dennis

 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.

Reply via email to